Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
2024-12-02
Political Position
He articulates strong opposition to the government’s tax policy, particularly the increase in excise duties and the introduction of new taxes. He argues that this tax policy is driving a wedge between the state and the people, alienating citizens from the government. He supports more proactive state investments, especially focusing on road construction during the economic crisis.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a good understanding of tax policy and its impacts, citing specific metrics such as the 0.13% increase in fuel prices. Further demonstrates knowledge of economic history by drawing parallels between the COVID-19 crisis and the US Great Depression, including the measures implemented during those periods.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Employs a direct and interrogative approach, putting specific questions to the ministers. The tone is critical yet courteous, always beginning with, "Thank you, Speaker/Chair! Esteemed Minister!" It combines logical arguments with emotional appeals when defending the interests of the public.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Limited information based on the data available: active participation in plenary sessions is evident, where questions are posed to ministers. The focus is systematically placed on economic and tax issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Expresses clear and principled opposition to the government's tax policy, criticizing its inconsistency and anti-public nature. The opposition is policy-centric, not personal, focusing on specific policy measures and their consequences.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The text emphasizes the necessity of supporting local municipalities, referencing the positive experience when the state allocated significant funding to local governments for road construction during the COVID-19 period. It also demonstrates an understanding of the challenges facing local authorities.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports lower taxes and public investment in infrastructure, especially road building during an economic crisis. It criticizes high energy prices, viewing them as an obstacle to competitiveness. Furthermore, it favors more expansive fiscal policies during crisis periods.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on tax and budget issues, as well as infrastructure financing. It primarily adopts the role of a critical interrogator, challenging the government on its policy decisions, particularly concerning excise duties and the funding of road construction.
2 Speeches Analyzed