Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
2024-11-20
Political Position
The speaker adopts a clearly opposing stance on restricting voting rights, arguing that it undermines democracy and national security. He connects internal security with social cohesion and warns that the exclusion of 130,000 people could turn them against the state. The speaker stresses that the true objective is to weaken political competition, specifically the Centre Party.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge in the fields of democracy and security, linking internal security with social cohesion. They cite specific figures (130,000 inhabitants) and know exactly which regions these people reside in. Furthermore, they demonstrate knowledge of the various sectors where the affected individuals are employed.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker uses questioning as a rhetorical device, posing a total of six direct questions to their colleagues. Their style is polite but critical, always starting with, "Thank you, good Chair! Esteemed colleague!" They employ logical arguments and concrete examples, emphasizing the contradictions in the opponents' positions.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All four speeches were delivered on the same day (November 20, 2024), which demonstrates active involvement in the discussion. The speaker notes that they have heard similar messages "in every forum," suggesting broader political engagement and the monitoring of issues across various contexts.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker sharply criticized the government and voiced support for the Centre Party, asserting that the true purpose of the proposed bill is to weaken that specific party. He accused his opponents of adopting urgent bills without proper analysis and engaging in political calculation, especially in connection with the power struggle currently underway in Tallinn.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker attempts to find common ground with opponents, commending one colleague for speaking about democracy rather than security. He/She agrees with Varro concerning the problem of urgent legislation, demonstrating a willingness to cooperate on specific issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker strongly emphasizes the local impact, specifically naming Tallinn, Ida-Viru County, Maardu, and Loksa as the main affected regions. He/She focuses on the role of municipalities and asks how local leaders should explain the restriction of these rights to their residents.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is insufficient data regarding economic views.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker stresses the importance of societal integration and warns that the exclusion of certain groups could harm social cohesion. He points out that the affected individuals work in crucial sectors like healthcare, rescue services, and the defense industry, emphasizing their contribution to society.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker focused specifically on the bill restricting voting rights, criticizing its urgent processing without any thorough analysis. He/She stressed that nobody knows the true impact the bill will have on security or democracy, and demanded more comprehensive consideration before its adoption.
4 Speeches Analyzed