Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov

15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session

2025-09-22

Political Position
The speaker consistently adopts a strong opposition stance against the government, leveling sharp criticism at the functioning of the legal system, tax policy, and security decisions alike. They are particularly vocal in their opposition to bringing Swedish prisoners into Estonia and to the state budget's tax reform, which they consider unjust towards the poor. Their rhetoric is value-based, stressing justice, human dignity, and the state's obligation to protect the most vulnerable.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates extensive knowledge across several fields—from the legal system and the work of the prosecutor's office to environmental issues and matters of local government. They are particularly well-versed in waste management issues, providing specific examples concerning the Uikala and Tallinn landfills. The speaker uses fact-based arguments, citing precise figures (2.3 million euros in tax debt, 780 million euros in budget impact).

14 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
An emotional and combative rhetorical style that combines personal investment with fact-based arguments. It frequently employs rhetorical questions and direct addresses ("Where are we headed if we continue like this?", "Is this fair?"). The tone is passionate and accusatory, particularly when criticizing the legal system and the government. Speeches often conclude with an emotional appeal or a warning.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is highly active in the Riigikogu plenary assembly, regularly addressing questions to various ministers within the framework of a single session. They focus on both interpellations and longer addresses, covering a wide spectrum of issues ranging from social matters to environmental and security concerns. They consistently demonstrate an interest in raising local issues within a national context.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Sharp criticism of the government and its members, particularly the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice. It accuses the government of remaining silent on crucial issues and pursuing misguided priorities. It also criticizes the performance of the Prosecutor's Office and the legal system. No willingness to compromise is shown; on the contrary, it demands sweeping changes and accountability.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A strong focus on local issues, especially in specific areas of Harju County: Maardu, Jõelähtme, and Kopli. Consistently raises issues that affect concrete communities, such as the impact of landfills on local residents or the closure of fire and rescue stations. Connects local concerns with broader national policy.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
A strongly social-democratic economic perspective, sharply criticizing the tax reform which, in their estimation, favors the wealthy and harms the poorer segments of the population. They advocate for a more progressive tax policy and a greater role for the state in guaranteeing social justice. Furthermore, concern is expressed regarding the plight of minimum wage earners and pensioners.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A strong stance regarding women's rights and the protection of vulnerable groups, particularly in light of the case involving the rape of a woman with dementia. It emphasizes the principles of human dignity and the rule of law. Furthermore, it expresses concern for the welfare of society's most vulnerable members—the elderly, people with disabilities, and low-income families.

14 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on legal system reform, amending the Bailiffs' Act, and strengthening environmental protection. It calls for legislative changes that would ensure better protection for vulnerable groups and increase the role of local government in addressing environmental issues. It supports imposing stricter requirements on companies participating in public procurement.

14 Speeches Analyzed