Session Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-06-16
Political Position
The Speaker takes a clearly critical stance toward the government’s policy, strongly emphasizing the negative impact of tax hikes on the Estonian people. His position is that the government is unable to provide viable solutions in critical areas such as waste management and crisis preparedness. The Speaker expresses skepticism regarding the technical feasibility of the EE-ALARM system, calling it "technically impossible."
6 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates technical expertise in the domains of telecommunications and crisis management, employing specific terminology such as "network engineers" and "FM frequencies." He/She references the practical experience and technological solutions of other countries (Finland, Israel). Regarding waste management issues, the speaker exhibits a practical grasp of the roles played by apartment associations and local authorities.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker's rhetoric is emotional and dramatic, employing phrases such as "panic attack" and "the cornerstone is cast on sand." They combine technical arguments with personal concerns, appealing directly to the "good Estonian people." The style is confrontational yet constructive—they do not propose discontinuation but rather seek improvements.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
All addresses took place on the same day (June 16, 2025) during the plenary session of the Riigikogu. The Speaker sequentially posed several questions to the ministers on various topics, demonstrating active participation in the parliamentary debates. He/She uses formal forms of address: "respected Minister" and "dear Chairman."
6 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The Speaker sharply criticized the government's policy, accusing it of implementing tax hikes and providing inadequate technical solutions. He expressed deep skepticism regarding the ministers' claims, demanding concrete evidence to back up their assertions. The criticism remains primarily policy-focused, rather than personal, concentrating on the deficiencies in systems and decision-making.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The Speaker demonstrated a willingness to cooperate, stating, "we can move this to the second reading," and praising his colleague Peeter Tali by saying that "together, we can improve this law, which is so crucial for the people." He stressed that the Centre Party (Keskerakond) is not proposing an adjournment, but instead wishes to contribute constructively.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker expresses strong concern over the tax hikes and excise duty increases, emphasizing their negative impact on ordinary citizens. He criticizes the government for increasing the tax burden on businesses, which ultimately gets passed on to consumers. His economic views center on protecting the taxpayer and preventing price increases.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is focusing on legislation concerning crisis management, particularly the EE-ALARM system and civil protection. He/She also addresses waste management regulations, posing specific questions regarding the division of responsibility between housing associations and local municipalities. His/Her approach is critically analytical, aiming to identify practical deficiencies in the existing laws.
6 Speeches Analyzed