Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Re-examination of the Act Amending the Act Preventing Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing and the Act on International Sanctions (640 UA), which was not announced by the President of the Republic
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The speaker expresses clear concern regarding the potential excessive restriction of the freedom of enterprise and the right to privacy in the context of the law on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing. This stance reflects a search for balance between security measures and citizens' fundamental rights.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs questioning as the primary rhetorical tool, addressing the presenter politely. The style is formal and constructive, focusing on specific legal aspects without emotional judgments.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates a constructive approach by addressing the rapporteur with questions, which suggests cooperation and dialogue within the parliament. The style is respectful and adheres to procedural rules.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker expresses concern regarding the potential restriction of the freedom of enterprise. This indicates a pro-business stance and a desire to protect economic liberties from regulatory measures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker emphasizes the importance of privacy, expressing concern over the potential infringement of citizens' privacy rights during the implementation of security measures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker focuses on the analysis of the law on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, examining its impact on fundamental rights. The approach is inquisitive and scrutinizing, avoiding direct support for or opposition to the legislation.
1 Speeches Analyzed