Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Reconsideration of the Act Amending the Act on Churches and Religious Communities (570 UA), Not Proclaimed by the President of the Republic
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker takes a strong stand in defense of religious freedom and against amending the law concerning churches and congregations. He supports the president's decision not to promulgate the law, stressing that it would violate the constitution and disproportionately restrict religious freedom. The speaker asserts that the law is primarily aimed against the 150,000-member Orthodox community and compares it to the anti-church attacks of the Soviet era.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of canon law, constitutional law, and issues concerning religious freedom. He/She accurately cites legislative procedures, refers to specific dates and events (e.g., August 2024, January 2025), and demonstrates a detailed understanding of the structure and administrative organization of the Estonian Orthodox Church. He/She also draws historical parallels from the Soviet era.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs emotional and combative rhetoric, blending it with legal arguments. They draw historical comparisons, particularly to the Soviet era, and utilize dramatic phrases such as "attack against Christianity" and "militant atheism." The speech is structured and well-reasoned, yet simultaneously passionate and highly accusatory toward opponents.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively participates in the Riigikogu sessions, submitting questions regarding the committee's work as well as delivering longer speeches. He/She closely monitors the legislative process and responds promptly to political developments, referencing the latest information and recent events.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker sharply criticizes "extremist politicians" and "militant politicians" who, in his estimation, are inciting restrictions on religious freedom. He accuses them of ego-driven behavior and compares their actions to the repressions of the Soviet era. He also criticizes the State Chancellery's advisor on symbolism in connection with the reform of religious holidays.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes ecumenical cooperation and refers to the unity of the Estonian Council of Churches, which was established in 1989 at Pühtitsa Convent. He supports the president's stance and calls for the preservation of peace in society, but shows no willingness to compromise regarding the law under consideration.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker primarily focuses on nationwide issues, but specifically mentions the Pühtitsa Convent and Nevsky Cathedral as important religious sites. He/She emphasizes Estonia’s vulnerability as a small country and the necessity of maintaining peace "in our beautiful and so vulnerable homeland."
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker strongly advocates for religious freedom and claims that an "attack on Christianity" is taking place. He supports the preservation of traditional religious holidays and criticizes their potential elimination. He also expresses concern over the spread of "violent teachings," hinting at other religions, but remains vague on this matter.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is focused on opposing the proposed amendments to the Churches and Congregations Act, stressing its unconstitutionality. He supports the President's decision not to promulgate the legislation and urges that the bill be rejected outright. His primary legislative priority remains the protection of religious freedom and the preservation of church autonomy.
2 Speeches Analyzed