Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
First reading of the draft resolution of the Riigikogu “Establishment of a Riigikogu investigative committee to investigate circumstances related to the Rail Baltic project” (460 OE)
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker clearly takes a critical stance regarding the Rail Baltic project, highlighting the state's strategic missteps and the resulting deadlock. They strongly support the formation of an investigative commission and call for the consideration of alternative solutions. Furthermore, they emphasize the weakness of the Estonian state compared to the national companies of Latvia and Lithuania within the railway sector.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Exhibits strong familiarity with railway projects and transport infrastructure, specifically citing the matter of Rail Baltic operators, the privatization of rolling stock, and the strategic significance of the Tallinn-Helsinki tunnel. Also demonstrates knowledge regarding the differences across the Baltic states' rail sectors.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
He/She employs questioning as the primary rhetorical device, addressing other speakers directly. The tone is critical and concerned, utilizing phrases such as "unfortunately, one must admit" and "the country is at a standstill." The argumentation is logical, supported by concrete facts.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The participation was limited to two brief questions during the parliamentary debate, indicating focused but not particularly active involvement. Both interventions were aimed at posing questions to other speakers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticizes the Government of the Republic for selling off Estonia’s railway rolling stock. Expresses concern that Estonia will fall behind compared to Latvia and Lithuania, which provide state support for their railway sectors. The criticism is primarily policy-based, not personal.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker positively notes that a similar commission has also been formed in Latvia, which signals support for international cooperation. Asking questions of other speakers demonstrates a constructive approach to the debate.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Strongly emphasizes Estonia's national interests and position within the context of the Baltic states. Highlights the significance of the Nordic connection via the Tallinn-Helsinki tunnel. Focuses on the issue of Estonia's reputation on the international stage.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports state ownership and control in strategic sectors, while criticizing the privatization of railway rolling stock. It expresses concern that foreign operators dominate Estonian rail transport, especially given that other Baltic states maintain state control.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the establishment of the Rail Baltic inquiry commission and the definition of its mandate. It requires that the commission also seek alternative solutions, rather than merely investigating existing problems. It emphasizes the importance of legislative oversight in major infrastructure projects.
2 Speeches Analyzed