Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Funding of fixed costs for pensioner organizations
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, information briefing
Political Position
The speaker takes a clear stance in favor of improving the welfare of pensioners, strongly supporting the separate funding of pensioners' associations' fixed costs directly from the state budget. He criticizes the current system, where the resources provided through the "Golden League" are not utilized for covering fixed expenses, and demands that the system be changed. Furthermore, he stresses the necessity of raising the quality of life and the standard of living for pensioners at a national level.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a strong understanding of the pensioner funding system, specifically mentioning the role of the NGO "Golden League" (MTÜ Kuldne Liiga) and the funding channeled through it. They also exhibit comparative knowledge, citing the Swedish pension system as an example, along with the services offered there, such as language training and state-organized events.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs criticism presented in the form of questions, maintaining a tone that is polite yet direct. They rely on concrete examples (an acquaintance living in Sweden) and facts (the Golden League financing system) to strengthen their arguments. The style is formal and respectful, but simultaneously insistent on receiving answers.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Both speeches took place on the same day (October 23, 2024), which indicates active participation in the parliamentary debate. The speaker continues the same topic across multiple speeches, pointing to the existence of a consistent pattern of a theme-centric approach.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker is criticizing the government's current approach to funding pensioners, directly asking the Prime Minister why the financing for fixed costs was withdrawn. The criticism is systemic rather than personal, focusing on policy shortcomings instead of individuals.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker addresses the Prime Minister directly, using a respectful tone and formal mode of address, which demonstrates a willingness to cooperate and adherence to parliamentary conventions. He/She is not confrontational, but rather seeks answers and solutions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker mentions their hometown, which suggests local connections, but generally focuses on national issues. They use an international comparison (the example of Sweden) to evaluate national policy.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports increasing state funding to cover the operational costs of pensioners' associations, which demonstrates support for increased public sector spending in the social sector. He/She views the state’s role as crucial in ensuring the quality of life for pensioners.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker is focusing on the social needs of retirees, stressing the necessity of improving their quality of life and raising their living standards. He/She views the social inclusion and support of retirees as a state obligation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker makes a concrete proposal to add a separate line item to the state budget for funding the permanent expenses of pensioners' associations. He focuses on budgetary policy and improving financing mechanisms in the area concerning pensioners.
2 Speeches Analyzed