Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Family Benefits Act (388 SE)
2024-09-19
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker adopts a distinctly left-wing, defensive position, criticizing the government's cuts as an attack on the most vulnerable. They strongly emphasize the necessity of social protection for children, pensioners, and low-income families. This position is characterized by sharp opposition to government policy and a demand for the protection of families.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong grasp of social policy, particularly regarding education funding and the pension system. Specific figures are cited (e.g., the 10% cut to education), and an understanding of pension indexation mechanisms is demonstrated. Domain awareness focuses primarily on social issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
It employs emotional and accusatory rhetoric, highlighting the plight of the vulnerable. The style is confrontational and highly critical of the government. It utilizes rhetorical questions and direct accusations to underscore the contradictions between the government’s promise of tax peace and its austerity program.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
It is not possible to draw conclusions about activity patterns based on the data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Launches a scathing critique against the ruling coalition and its leaders, accusing them of attacking the vulnerable. The opposition is principled and uncompromising, focusing on the inconsistencies in the government's policies. It particularly highlights the hardening rhetoric from the coalition leadership regarding austerity measures.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Based on the data, it is not possible to draw conclusions about the collaboration style.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
It is not possible to draw conclusions about the regional focus based on the data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports social spending and opposes austerity measures that target vulnerable groups. It criticizes declaring a tax freeze while simultaneously cutting social expenditures. Its economic views are clearly redistributive, prioritizing social protection over fiscal discipline.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It places a strong emphasis on protecting children and pensioners, highlighting the importance of extracurricular education, particularly for children from low-income families. Its social views are progressive, supporting state intervention aimed at reducing social inequality. It regards the protection of families as the state's primary duty.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Focuses on the discussion of the Family Benefits Act and social protection issues. It adopts a critical stance regarding the government's proposals, demanding a more active role for the Riigikogu in protecting families. The legislative focus is clearly on maintaining and strengthening social protection measures.
2 Speeches Analyzed