Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Draft resolution "Proposal to the Government of the Republic of Estonia to allocate funds for co-financing Tallinna Hospital" (498 OE) – First Reading
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the construction of the Tallinn Hospital and expresses clear criticism regarding the current healthcare system. He emphasizes that free healthcare services are virtually inaccessible due to long waiting lists, whereas paid services are immediately available. As a member of the Centre Party, he expresses optimism about the hospital project and trusts that voters will soon pass judgment on the current decisions at the elections.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a solid understanding of the healthcare system's issues, highlighting specific examples concerning waiting lists and service accessibility. They ask specific questions regarding the proportions of funding between the state, the city, and European structural funds, which indicates an awareness of the financing mechanisms. They also ask practical questions about the construction timeline and implementation.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker employs an emotional and personal approach, starting with the words "väga kurb" (very sad) and using everyday examples of healthcare problems. The style is direct and folksy, incorporating practical examples ("you press the button," "snap!"). The speaker maintains an optimistic tone despite the criticism and concludes on a hopeful note.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in the parliamentary debate, delivering three addresses on the same subject during a single session. They consistently raise questions and seek clarification regarding both the financing and the schedule, demonstrating a systematic approach to addressing the issue.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker indirectly criticizes the current government, claiming that good decisions "are politicized to such an extent that nothing ever comes of them." He/She suggests that the Estonian people will "deliver their verdict on all these actions in the upcoming elections," which indicates a general critique of the government's performance.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker maintains a polite and constructive tone, addressing the recipient as "esteemed presenter" and utilizing the collective "we" form when expressing optimism. They seek cooperation by posing specific questions and demonstrate a readiness for dialogue.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker clearly emphasizes the regional impact, noting that the hospital would be beneficial "not only to Tallinn, but also to its immediate surroundings." In conclusion, they reference "the people of North Estonia," showcasing a wider regional perspective for this Tallinn-centered project.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker specifically inquired about the financing ratios between the state, local government, and European funds, which demonstrates a pragmatic approach to public sector funding. He supports the state's investment in healthcare but is seeking clarity on the exact funding scheme.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker heavily focuses on healthcare accessibility as an issue of social justice. He/She criticizes the situation where services are only accessible to those who can afford to pay, and stresses the necessity of free healthcare services for all citizens.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The speaker is actively involved in the discussion of the Tallinn Hospital co-financing draft bill, supporting the allocation of state funds for the project. They focus on specific questions regarding financing and implementation, aiming to influence the decision-making process through constructive inquiries.
3 Speeches Analyzed