Agenda Profile: Vladimir Arhipov
Second Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (443 SE)
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
Political Position
It clearly articulates opposition to income tax redistribution measures, comparing them directly to collectivization. While supporting aid for lagging municipalities, it argues that this should not happen at the expense of other local governments. It demands the restoration of the previously abolished tax system as a fairer solution.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates a strong grasp of local government financing issues, providing specific examples regarding the impact of land tax redistribution. Uses precise figures (millions of euros) and references previous changes to the tax system, thereby showcasing deep knowledge of the history of municipal financing.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Uses emotionally charged comparisons (collectivization) and colloquial expressions ("not a peep"). The rhetoric is direct and critical, combining historical parallels with fact-based arguments. Poses direct questions to opponents, demanding explanations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
During the specified period, this is limited to two addresses on the same day within the framework of the discussion concerning the Income Tax Act. Both addresses focus on the same topic, but from different angles—ranging from general opposition to specific examples.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The speaker criticizes the government’s tax policy and redistribution measures, accusing them of unfairness. They express strong opposition to the current approach, but refrain from personal attacks, focusing instead on criticizing the policy measures themselves.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Clearly represents the interests of Harju County, specifically mentioning Viimsi Parish, Maardu City, and Lääne-Harju Parish. It emphasizes that it represents the entirety of Harju County, not just individual local governments, thereby demonstrating a regional approach.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Expresses opposition to the redistribution of taxes from wealthier regions to poorer ones, preferring a system where all local municipalities would retain their own tax revenue. It supports assisting lagging regions, but not at the expense of other local governments.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on the changes to the Income Tax Act, presenting clear opposition to the proposed amendments. It demands the restoration of the previous tax system and criticizes the failure to deliver on promises regarding compensation for the redistribution of land tax.
2 Speeches Analyzed