Session Profile: Marko Mihkelson
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-05-15
Political Position
The political focus is on safeguarding the security and survival of the Estonian state and supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression. The speaker strongly supports the bill under discussion, viewing it as a crucial step in defending the global order and Estonia's rule of law. This stance is clearly value-based, underscoring the necessity of bringing about Russia's strategic defeat. The policy aims to take every step possible to help protect the security of Estonia and its allies.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise on international security, the principles of the rule of law, and the utilization of frozen assets. Reference is made to the Constitutional Committee’s comprehensive work and the consultation with experts (both international and domestic) during the preparation of the draft legislation. Specific emphasis is placed on the knowledge related to channeling the interest income generated by frozen assets toward military supplies for Ukraine.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is urgent, persuasive, and formal, emphasizing the critical importance of Estonian state security. Both emotional appeals (referencing Putin's goal to change the world order and genocide) and logical argumentation (a reference to the work of the Constitutional Committee) are employed. The speaker uses strong judgments, for instance, calling Putin an autocrat and labeling criticism of the draft bill as criticism directed against the Estonian state.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker highlighted active participation in international meetings where allies and partners are awaiting Estonia's decision regarding frozen assets. This demonstrates regular communication with colleagues in Europe and the United States.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Opponents are sharply criticized, with the criticism of the bill being labeled as criticism of the Estonian state itself. The criticism is aimed at those who question the validity or constitutionality of the bill, despite the Constitutional Committee having completed thorough work. Furthermore, opponents are reproached for forgetting Russia’s true objectives.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The cooperation style emphasizes following an international example and coordinated action with allies, specifically mentioning the United States and the European Union. The speaker stresses that Estonia's move is anticipated and will be taken as a model, demonstrating a desire to be an internationally followed leader.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly on international security issues (the war in Ukraine, Russia’s strategic defeat) and matters at the Estonian national level (long-term survival, the legal framework). Allies and partners from Europe, as well as the United States, are mentioned.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic positions concern the use of interest income generated by frozen assets, supporting its channeling not only toward Ukraine's reconstruction but also toward real military supplies. The fiscal emphasis is on supporting security and defense capabilities.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on supporting a specific bill concerning national security and the provision of foreign aid, likely related to frozen assets. The speaker is a strong proponent of the bill and stresses its constitutional compliance, citing the work of the Constitutional Committee.
2 Speeches Analyzed