Session Profile: Andres Metsoja
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
2024-10-23
Political Position
The political position focuses on defending strong parliamentary democracy and government accountability. The speaker emphasizes that motions of no confidence must follow specific utterances, particularly those that belittle or undermine the parliament's role or capacity. This stance is strongly value-based, defending the authority and functional boundaries of the Riigikogu.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the principles of parliamentary democracy and matters concerning governmental accountability. He authoritatively addresses the philosophical justification for a motion of no confidence and the relationship between the parliament and the government. Conceptual terms are used, such as "to philosophically devalue" and "the limit of capacity."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style of address is formal, serious, and challenging, posing a direct question to the minister. Logical and procedural appeals are employed, focusing on the core concepts of a parliamentary state and the boundaries of responsibility. The tone is critical, yet it strives to remain on a conceptual level, distinguishing between the underlying mindset and the specific utterances.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity shows participation in a plenary session where ministerial responsibility and a motion of no confidence were addressed. The address was framed as a question directed at the minister, indicating active involvement in the debate. Data regarding other speeches or the frequency of participation is unavailable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opposition is aimed at Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is being criticized for the philosophical belittling of parliament. The criticism is intense and procedural, asserting that such conduct must result in a motion of no confidence. The opposition focuses on the government member's attitude toward the legislative branch.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is absent; the discourse is rather confrontational and presents a challenge to the government member. The parliament's right and obligation to hold the government accountable are emphasized. There is no data available concerning inter-party cooperation or readiness for compromise.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is exclusively at the national level, addressing parliamentary democracy and government accountability in Estonia. Regional or international issues are not covered.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is procedural, centering on the justification for a motion of no confidence and the specific conditions under which it should be pursued. The priority is safeguarding Parliament's authority and capacity against governmental overconfidence.
1 Speeches Analyzed