Agenda Profile: Andres Metsoja
Inquiry Regarding the Electricity Supply of Saaremaa (No. 68)
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position centers on the practical consequences and implementation challenges of the recently enacted law (the clearing charge). The speaker raises concerns about whether the maintenance clearing of utility line corridors will trigger an additional fee of 4,000 euros per hectare. This highlights worries regarding the unexpected costs associated with the regulations and whether the law's intended objective is being met. The position is primarily results-oriented and emphasizes clarity in policy execution.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The presenter demonstrates expertise in the field of energy infrastructure (Elektrilevi, line corridors) and environmental fees (clearing fee). Specific numbers and technical details are used, such as 6,000 kilometers of corridors and 4,000 euros per hectare. The expertise is evident in the analysis of the intersection points between legislation and practical business operations.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and questioning, addressing the minister to seek clarification. The speaker employs logical argumentation, linking the recent legislation to Elektrilevi's specific operational plans. The tone is measured, but urgently demands clarity regarding the financial implications of the law.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data is limited to a single interpellation in the Riigikogu chamber, which indicates activity in exercising legislative oversight. The speaker is engaged in scrutinizing the government's activities during the implementation of specific political decisions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at the lack of clarity in the implementation of government policy, particularly in the context of the land-clearing charge (or deforestation fee). There is no direct confrontation or personal attack; instead, what is being demanded is an official clarification regarding the interpretation of the law. The disagreement is purely a procedural matter concerning policy implementation.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Although the title of the inquiry refers to Saaremaa's electricity supply, the speech itself focuses on the impact of a national law (the clearing fee) and the activities of a major company (Elektrilevi). The regional focus is indirect, rather emphasizing the national problem of infrastructure maintenance.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives emphasize concern regarding the additional costs imposed on companies (Elektrilevi) by regulations. The speaker seeks to clarify whether infrastructure maintenance results in significant financial obligations, indicating a desire to avoid unnecessary fiscal strain. The focus is on the regulatory burden and its effect on infrastructure.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward monitoring and interpreting the implementation of the recently adopted Deforestation Fee Act. The speaker is acting in an oversight role, asking whether the law applies to the expansion of utility line corridors and what specific costs this entails. The priority is clarifying the law's impact on infrastructure maintenance.
1 Speeches Analyzed