By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran
Total Sessions: 52
Fully Profiled: 52
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker hopes that the Ministry of Climate will be able to amend the draft bill and incorporate the necessary analyses before the second reading, citing the desire to proceed with a bill that is substantively necessary. This signals a willingness to cooperate, provided the ministry rectifies the procedural and substantive errors. There is no direct information available regarding cross-party cooperation.
2025-10-15
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The collaborative style is one of recognition, positively acknowledging the contribution made by the previous official (Vladimir Svet) in initiating the process. Communication with the Prime Minister is focused on gathering information, aiming to ensure that the government addresses environmental requirements adequately.
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Not enough data.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
There is not enough data.
2025-10-06
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Insufficient data.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
There is not enough data.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
The collaborative style indicates a willingness to acknowledge the internal consensus within the commission, highlighting that the members of the Culture Committee were unambiguous regarding the preservation of the Suuremõisa vocational school. This points to a desire to rely on a broad-based political agreement when opposing the ministry’s actions.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The style of cooperation is open and constructive, beginning with praise for the opposing side ("for a very pleasant, balanced series of answers"). The speaker calls for a collective and broad-based debate ("Wouldn't we need a debate?") aimed at solving important social issues.
2025-09-15
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker sees the need for cooperation with local governments in promoting non-formal environmental education. The speaker also inquired about inter-ministerial communication (between the Environmental Board and the Ministry of Climate) regarding the prevention of the illegal release of animals into the wild.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Not enough data.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker works in cooperation with colleagues, referencing the submission of inquiries by "us" and listing the 10 Riigikogu members (MPs) who signed the follow-up question. Cooperation with the Social Democrats is also mentioned regarding the re-submission of the "vicious dogs law amendment."
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no data available regarding direct cooperation with colleagues. The speaker emphasizes the need for a broad, nationwide agreement (between the state, employers, and employees), citing Denmark's historical example, to solve problems of inequality and national stability. He/She criticizes the government for failing to cooperate with trade unions when adopting the labor law.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing.
No data available.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The collaborative approach demonstrates a readiness to acknowledge the opposing party's fundamental principles (avoiding arbitrary penalties), thus signaling complete agreement. At the same time, the speaker disputes the opposing party's procedural preferences, which result in endless debates, illustrating a pragmatic but critical stance.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker emphasizes that the current decision-making process lacks negotiation, debate, and balanced judgment, indicating that they value thorough discussion and consensus. Direct cooperation or a willingness to compromise is not demonstrated in this speech; rather, the speaker criticizes the opposing side for its lack of these qualities.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
The speaker stresses the need for broader cooperation and inclusion, demanding the involvement of scientists, environmental advocates, and trade unions in government councils. This indicates a desire to bring a wider spectrum of experts and stakeholders into the decision-making process to ensure balanced decisions.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The speaker underscores the need for broad-based engagement and building trust between the state and its citizens. He points out that the development plan for the environmental sector involved numerous ministries, stakeholders, experts, and scientists, and calls for the continued inclusion of all parties in strategic planning. Restoring trust with landowners is set as the primary objective of the compensation scheme.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
As the Commission's representative, he stresses the need for consensual decisions during the handling of the draft legislation (e.g., the motion to conclude the first reading). Nevertheless, his personal stance and that of his faction are uncompromising: they propose suspending the bill's proceedings until the issues of landowner compensation and civil rights have been resolved.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is too little data.
2025-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker commends the initiators of the amendment (the Isamaa faction) for its necessity and notes that procedural decisions within the committee were made consensually. Nevertheless, he expresses disappointment that his own substantive proposals, which the hunters deemed necessary, were disregarded due to political opposition, citing ineffective cooperation on matters of substance.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes that the bill became more sensible during the deliberation process and that the concern he raised (the prohibition of a dangerous drilling method) was taken into consideration. This points to constructive involvement in the drafting of the bill and a readiness for compromises that ultimately improve the quality of the legislation.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Acknowledgment is given to the good cooperation of the previous coalition, which provided the current government with a strong opportunity to carry its work forward. The style adopted towards the current government is aggressive and uncompromising, focusing on policy shortcomings.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The cooperation style is facilitative and focused on finding solutions within expert bodies, rather than rushing the adoption of legislation. The speaker stresses the necessity of submitting this crucial topic (the regulation of problem animals/nuisance individuals) for discussion to the large carnivore cooperation council, demonstrating openness to the involvement of specialists and the consideration of aligning it with other draft laws (e.g., 553).
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The collaborative style is respectful and appreciative, beginning with praise for the presentation. The reference to the committee discussion indicates a willingness to participate collegially in the legislative process and to ask the presenter questions directly to obtain clarification.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker highlighted cooperation with colleague Raimond, commending him for the preparation of the draft bill and affirming that they are jointly on the right track. This demonstrates openness and support for colleagues' initiatives.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The data is insufficient. (The statement is a critical remark and contains no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or bilateral initiatives.)
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative style is consensual and supportive, emphasizing the Environment Committee's unanimous decision regarding the inclusion of the draft legislation on the agenda and the conclusion of the first reading. Furthermore, the support for the bill from the Ministry of Climate (hunting advisor Aimar Rakko) was also noted.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker supports the government's draft bill, indicating a willingness to cooperate in passing the necessary legislation, though this support is accompanied by strong criticism regarding the lack of ambition in the policy. In a subsequent address, the speaker poses a clarifying question to the rapporteur concerning the division of competence.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker urges all political parties to engage in common, substantive, and in-depth cooperation on solving the climate crisis, emphasizing that this issue must not become an arena for political squabbles. He/She acknowledges and thanks the rapporteurs for their work, but simultaneously demands that the Chair provide a solution to protect the rapporteurs from unfair accusations.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The speaker agrees with the prime minister regarding the need for security, the development of defense capabilities, and the strengthening of European Union unity. While there is readiness to cooperate on security matters, a strong substantive objection is presented in the context of economic policy, demanding that social and natural environmental factors be taken into account.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker demonstrates a supportive and cooperative style, thanking the previous presenter for a clear and unambiguous statement, which indicates a shared understanding regarding the necessity of the legislative change. The cooperation is rooted in support for the security policy put forth by the government or the previous speaker.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
Not enough data
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
There is too little data.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker is cooperative, offering thanks and recognition to the Chancellor of Justice, and seeking expert opinion and solutions from that office regarding procedural issues in the legislative process. The tone is open, focusing on finding solutions through state institutions.
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Demonstrates readiness for cross-party cooperation, citing the conditional amendment initiated by the Social Democrats, which garnered 19 signatures of support. The aim of this cooperation was risk mitigation. However, it simultaneously strongly criticizes the Commission for its lack of cooperative spirit, given that the proponents of the amendments were not included in the consultation process.
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The collaborative style is highly consensus-driven, emphasizing that all decisions (the appointment of council members, the submission of draft legislation, and the designation of the representative to the leading committee) were made unanimously within the committee. He also notes the positive remark made by colleague Rain Epler regarding the rotation of membership on the RMK council.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The speaker stressed that they were presenting a personal viewpoint, not speaking on behalf of the faction. There is no information available regarding cooperation or willingness to compromise with other political forces.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Data is scarce.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Insufficient data.
2024-04-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
There isn't enough data.
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is cooperative, thanking the Rural Affairs Committee for bringing the topic to the floor and praising the presenters for their "excellent" framing of the issues. He/She expresses agreement with most of the viewpoints, which demonstrates an openness to consensus and support for institutional partners (the Estonian University of Life Sciences).
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is formal and interrogative, aimed at establishing the minister's accountability and obtaining clarification. There is no information regarding a willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker positively highlighted the communication between the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Climate between the readings, which helped resolve the sticking points. This demonstrates openness to inter-ministerial dialogue and a willingness to compromise when it ensures better legislation.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The style of cooperation is open and inclusive, emphasizing successful collaboration between the ministries (the Ministry of Climate, the Ministry of Social Affairs, and the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture) and the committees of the Riigikogu (Parliament). We consider the necessity of involving local governments between the two readings particularly important to ensure the law's practical applicability.
2024-03-12
15th Riigikogu, 3rd plenary sitting
The speaker is open to compromise and expresses hope that the two ministries (the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of the Environment) will find a solution to the difficult issues between the two readings of the bill. The preference is to seek solutions through existing laws and planning frameworks.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The cooperation style is open and constructive, as the speaker seeks clarification and proposes necessary corrections when an error is identified. This points to a readiness to collaborate on refining the legislative text.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The style of engagement is polite and respectful, starting with an expression of thanks for raising such an interesting topic. This is more of a dialogue requiring clarification and data, rather than a direct offer of collaboration.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Insufficient information
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
Data is scarce.