Agenda Profile: Tiit Maran

Education policy

2025-09-17

Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.

Political Position
The speaker vehemently objects to the Ministry of Education's mechanistic approach to vocational education, an approach that fails to account for the unique characteristics of the regions. This political position is focused on the preservation of the Suuremõisa Vocational School, emphasizing its educational and cultural importance while demanding a sustainable funding model. The stance is strongly outcome-oriented and highly critical of the ministry's procedural actions.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in regional vocational education and administrative procedures, referencing direct communication with entrepreneurs in Hiiumaa. He/She is well-versed in the procedural conflicts between ministries and parliamentary committees and emphasizes that schools hold greater importance than merely "being a single link in a mechanistic framework."

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and pressing, expressing indignation over the ministry's actions, which disregarded the committee's positions. The speaker employs a logical, procedural framework, posing a direct question to the Prime Minister regarding the significance of committee decisions from the government's point of view. The tone is formal, yet it contains personal frustration ("the weirder part for me").

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker refers to their participation in the Culture Committee session on June 9th and returning to the topic in the autumn (September). This demonstrates purposeful action in monitoring and publicly raising specific education policy issues following the committee's work.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is with the system and officials of the Ministry of Education, who are criticized for their mechanistic approach and disregard for procedure. The criticism is intense because the ministry proceeded with the matter despite the commission's unambiguous opposition, thereby essentially nullifying the commission's work. The speaker questions the ministry's adherence to the decisions made by parliamentary committees.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the positive and unequivocal cooperation with the members of the Culture Committee who supported preserving the school. This demonstrates an openness to collaboration, especially concerning regional education and cultural matters, and the speaker uses this consensus to criticize the ministry's actions.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is heavily regional, specifically centered on preserving the Hiiumaa and Suuremõisa vocational school. Emphasis is placed on the school's crucial role for local entrepreneurs and the cultural vitality of the region, contrasting this regional importance with the centralized system.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic considerations support regional vocational education as a crucial factor for local business, pointing to the firm conviction among Hiiumaa entrepreneurs regarding the necessity of the vocational school. There is a demand for a sustainable funding model that would guarantee support for the regional economy.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The key social issue is education policy, which emphasizes the regional importance of vocational training. Maintaining the school is viewed as both an educational and a cultural asset, vital for the local community.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Legislative efforts are centered on upholding the decisions of the Culture Committee and providing oversight of the ministry's operations. The priority is to find a sustainable funding model for regional educational institutions and ensure that the committees' decisions play a significant role in the government's work.

1 Speeches Analyzed