Agenda Profile: Tiit Maran
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in consequence, amending other laws (609 SE) - second reading
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
Political Position
The political position is strongly in favor of Bill 609 SE, highlighting its benefits for numerous interest groups and its opposition to the few monopolistic interests. The speaker stresses the importance of expediting the process to prevent endless litigation that would otherwise impede the accountability of those holding monopolistic positions. This stance is clearly policy- and results-driven, focusing squarely on the efficiency of the legal proceedings.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in competition law and procedural swiftness, focusing on the impact of multi-stage litigation on the resolution of monopolistic cases. Specific terminology is employed, such as "monopolistic position" and "multi-stage deliberation," emphasizing the need for swift and effective administration of justice.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is analytical and interrogative, initiating the discussion with an acknowledgment. Logical arguments are employed regarding the necessity of speed and efficiency in the process, contrasting this with endless court debates. The address concludes with a pointed rhetorical question that calls into question the practical efficacy of the opposing party's position.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
This confrontation targets those who favor lengthy, multi-tiered court proceedings, as such preferences impede the accountability of individuals holding monopolistic positions. The criticism itself is procedural, pointing to the opponents' previous assertions regarding fair sentencing, while simultaneously casting doubt on the practical viability of their proposed solutions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective advocates for robust regulation targeting monopolistic interests, prioritizing the welfare of broader stakeholder groups and general businesses. The focus lies on guaranteeing competition and ensuring swift legal intervention to preempt market distortions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is on the draft Act Amending the Competition Act (609 SE), which the speaker strongly supports. The objective is to ensure the swift implementation of the law, thereby preventing the bottlenecks caused by multi-stage judicial proceedings when resolving monopolistic cases.
1 Speeches Analyzed