Agenda Profile: Tiit Maran
Draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE) - first reading
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the draft amendment to the Competition Act (609 SE), arguing that it ignores consumer interests and is ineffective in combating economic crime. The political focus is centered on protecting the public interest and questioning the motives behind pushing the bill through. This position is clearly policy-driven, emphasizing the law's actual impact on people.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in competition law, regulatory procedures (parallel procedure), and the digital economy (telecom pricing). He relies on European Commission statistics regarding the detection of competition infringements and cites the unanimous opposition of national regulators (the Competition Authority, the Financial Supervision Authority, and the Data Protection Inspectorate) to the proposed model.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and interrogative, beginning with sarcastic praise ("cutely and sincerely") before launching a substantive attack. Strong rhetorical questions are employed to cast doubt on the minister's motives ("In whose interest?"), balancing the emotional appeal (consumer protection) with factual references to expert opinions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data indicates activity surrounding the first reading of the Draft Competition Act (Bill 609 SE) in May 2025. Data regarding broader operational patterns is unavailable.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is directed against the minister and the government, who are pushing through an ineffective legislative amendment. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, accusing the opposing side of disregarding consumer interests and suspecting ulterior motives behind the change in law.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on Estonian national regulations and competition issues, particularly the fight against economic crime. The analysis utilizes international benchmarks, referencing European Commission statistics and the telecommunication prices of neighboring countries.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives emphasize the necessity of strong competition oversight and regulation to protect consumers from high prices, citing the telecommunications sector as an example. There is opposition to legislative amendments that weaken the fight against economic crime, prioritizing consumer welfare over narrow business interests.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The primary social focus is on consumer protection and representing consumer interests within the legislative process. It is emphasized that legal amendments must take into account the needs of people and consumers, rather than solely focusing on supporting business.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative priority is the rejection of the draft Act amending the Competition Act (Bill 609 SE). The speaker is a strong opponent of the bill, questioning the suitability of the proposed parallel procedure for combating economic crime.
2 Speeches Analyzed