Agenda Profile: Tiit Maran
First Reading of the Draft Resolution (455 OE) of the Riigikogu, "Recall of a Member of the Supervisory Board of the Environmental Investments Centre Foundation and Appointment of a New Member"
2024-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
Political Position
The political stance centers on the recall of a member of the Council of the Environmental Investments Centre and the appointment of a new member. Maran strongly supports the consensus decisions reached by the committee, stressing procedural clarity and the swift adoption of resolutions. His approach is purely procedural and results-oriented, focusing on communicating the outcomes of the commission's work.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and committee work, providing a precise overview of the decisions reached during the Environment Committee session. Their authority stems from their role as the representative of the responsible committee and their knowledge of the appointment procedures for the KIK (Environmental Investment Centre) Council. They correctly employ parliamentary procedural terminology, such as "draft legislation" (or "bill"), "responsible committee," and "consensus decision."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is formal, neutral, and purely informative, focusing on providing an overview of the committee session. Maran repeatedly emphasizes the existence of consensus and the absence of discussion ("the discussion was very brief"), maintaining a businesslike and procedural tone. Emotional or persuasive appeals are absent; the presentation is fact-based.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Maran addresses the Riigikogu as the representative of the lead committee, presenting a report on the session of the Environmental Committee, which took place on June 3rd. His role is connected to the handling of a specific draft bill, and he has been appointed to represent it in the plenary assembly.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no opposition; the speaker emphasizes that there was complete consensus within the commission and that virtually no substantive discussion took place. There is no criticism, neither from political opponents nor regarding the procedures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is highly consensual, as the speaker repeatedly emphasizes that all decisions, including the submission of the draft bill to the plenary session and its inclusion on the agenda, were made by consensus. He refers to the proposal put forward by the Social Democratic Party faction, which was adopted by the committee without objection.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is currently on Riigikogu Draft Resolution 455 OE, which concerns the replacement of a board member of the Environmental Investments Centre Foundation. Maran is a proponent of this draft and serves as the spokesperson for the proceedings on behalf of the lead committee. He highlights the consensus achieved regarding the placement of the draft on the agenda and its submission to the plenary session.
1 Speeches Analyzed