By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s tax policy and economic management, highlighting the consequences of ill-conceived decisions and short-sightedness. The speaker prioritizes the restoration of the country's competitiveness, the financing of national defense via borrowing, and the support of large families, which is deemed essential for the preservation of the nation-state. Criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of the government's operations and the repetition of historical errors. The framework of this position is primarily results-oriented and values-based (the preservation of the nation-state).

The speaker strongly opposes the government's fiscal strategy, particularly the cascade of tax hikes, and casts doubt on the claim that they are justified by national defense needs. He argues that the real reason is to cover the Reform Party's costly election promise (half a billion euros). This demonstrates strong opposition to the government's priorities, rooted in political performance and posturing.

The political stance centers on strong opposition to the legislation known as the 'tax hump,' which is considered deeply unpopular with the public. This position is value-based, emphasizing the necessity of protecting the finances of poorer and lower-income individuals. The opposition to the law is intense, demanding its complete abandonment.