Agenda Profile: Mart Maastik
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Competition Act and, in connection therewith, amending other laws (609 SE)
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political position centers on procedural fairness and transparency in lawmaking, questioning the concept of "more than democratic inclusion." The speaker voices moderate criticism of the process, suggesting that coalition agreements might overshadow democratic standards. Their focus is primarily procedural and policy-driven.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates competence in the legislative process, particularly concerning the handling of amendments and the involvement of stakeholders. Specifically, they are aware of the proposals submitted by the Bar Association and the ensuing discussions. They require precise information regarding whether all proposals resulted in a compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaking style is direct and interrogative, starting with an ironic tone concerning the procedural language, which the speaker himself labels "humorously questioned." The speaker is formal when addressing the rapporteur, but subsequently demands a clear and detailed answer regarding interest group compromises.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The pattern of activity is limited to participation in a single legislative debate (the second reading of the Competition Act), where the speaker poses a series of detailed, sequential questions to the rapporteur.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at procedural issues, calling into question the standards of inclusion utilized by the coalition (or the majority). The objection is procedural, asking whether the coalition agreements are equivalent to democratic procedure.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of reaching a compromise with external interest groups, specifically the Bar Association, demonstrating an interest in finding a comprehensive solution. He attempts to verify whether compromises were actually reached, which indicates an openness to various solutions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Although the discussion pertains to the Competition Act, which is an economic topic, the speaker is not expressing views on the substance of taxes, expenditures, or regulation. The focus is on procedure and the involvement of stakeholders, rather than the economic policy content.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the second reading of the Draft Act Amending the Competition Act (609 SE). The presenter will act as a critical interrogator, concentrating on whether the amendments submitted by the Bar Association ultimately resulted in a compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed