Agenda Profile: Mart Maastik

Inquiry regarding the departure of state institutions from rural areas (no 653)

2024-11-04

15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting

Political Position
The political stance is strongly opposed to centralization and austerity measures that damage rural areas. The speaker criticizes the government's decisions as short-sighted, stressing that they are killing life in peripheral regions. The focus is results-oriented, concentrating on the regional dimension of the policy and its negative impact on local communities.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise in the fields of regional education and specialized medical care, highlighting specific examples such as the student count at Hiiumaa Vocational School (107) and the reduction of services at Kuressaare Hospital. Technical terms and details are employed, including computer tomograph, digital registration, and the availability of specialists (orthopedist, hematologist) in Saaremaa.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is one of concern and urgency, balancing logical arguments (such as long waiting times and distances) with emotional appeals regarding the decline of rural life and the preservation of cultural values. The speaker uses specific case studies (Hiiumaa Vocational School, Kuressaare Hospital) to substantiate their viewpoints, while gently starting by acknowledging the minister's good intentions.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker demonstrates active engagement with local stakeholders, mentioning a meeting with the management of Kuressaare Hospital last week. This indicates regular on-the-ground activity and the collection of information regarding regional issues.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main criticism is aimed at the policies of the government and ministries, which implement austerity measures without taking the regional dimension into account. The criticism is policy-driven and intense, calling the decisions short-sighted and doubly detrimental, but the attacks are not personal.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker expresses agreement with the previous speakers ("I generally agree very much with what the previous speakers said"), indicating a readiness to cooperate with colleagues who share similar views. The Minister is called upon to take a step back and think more broadly, which suggests a desire to change the government's policy and find a wider consensus.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is strongly regional and centered on the islands, highlighting the specific problems of Hiiumaa and Saaremaa (Kuressaare) as concrete examples. It is emphasized that consolidating services into major centers ignores the needs of residents in peripheral areas, the long distances involved (250–400 km), and the scarcity of local jobs.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker opposes the short-sighted goal of austerity if it leads to regional decline and job losses in rural areas. Emphasis is placed on the need to preserve local jobs and utilize existing regional infrastructure, such as medical equipment acquired with EU subsidies.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The main social issue revolves around the quality of life and access to essential services in rural areas, particularly specialized medical care and vocational education. It is emphasized that avoiding long treatment waiting lists and ensuring the availability of services are critically important for patients, even pointing out the futility of posthumous treatment.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The address focuses on the government's responsibility for regional policy and administrative decisions, which has been presented in the form of an interpellation, demanding changes to existing policies. There is no information regarding the initiation or support of specific draft legislation.

2 Speeches Analyzed