By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

The style is formal, analytical, and persuasive, balancing logical arguments (the rapid pace of medical development) with ethical appeals (reducing the fear associated with the end of life). Personal medical experience (the example of childhood leukemia) is utilized to enhance emotional impact and illustrate scientific progress. The discourse is structured, encompassing both a clarification of the legislative bill's background and an emphasis on future-oriented investments.

The style is predominantly formal, factual, and procedure-oriented, especially during the steering committee's report, where long lists of dates and decisions are presented. It uses logical arguments, relying on facts and committee decisions, while maintaining a neutral tone. The emotional appeal is brief, focusing on the patient's interests and the necessity of reducing youth smoking.

The style is formal and concerned, presenting the Minister with a direct question aimed at finding solutions. Both a logical appeal (referencing the state's obligations as an e-state) and personal and colleagues' experience are utilized to emphasize the urgency and scope of the problem.

The style is direct, empathetic, and solution-oriented, focusing on the concerns of a specific vulnerable group. The Chancellor of Justice is addressed in an unusually familiar manner ("sinatan," meaning the informal 'you' is used), which suggests either a personal relationship or a desire to establish an immediate and frank dialogue. The appeal is directed both at logic (seeking a fair solution) and emotion (people in a difficult situation).

The rhetorical style is predominantly formal, explanatory, and procedural, especially when introducing amendments to legislation. The speaker relies on logical arguments, referencing committee discussions, consensus, and the substance of the law, while avoiding emotional appeals. The initial address is a direct, fact-based inquiry that necessitates the presentation of existing data.