Session Profile: Irja Lutsar
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2025-09-04
Political Position
The political position focuses strongly on the efficiency and accountability of the Riigikogu’s working procedures. The speaker criticizes the 35-minute waste of time and demands that if a presenter is absent, a replacement must be ensured or an apology issued. The position is clearly results-based, emphasizing the importance of preparation and conscientiousness.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of Estonia's current public health regulations, particularly regarding isolation requirements for close contacts. They utilize the recommendations of the Health Board (Terviseamet) to refute potential illness-related justifications for absence.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is critical and direct, expressing astonishment and impatience regarding procedural delays. The speaker uses logical and practical arguments (the existence of a mobile phone), demanding accountability and clarity. The tone is rather admonishing and demanding.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is actively involved in a protracted procedural debate taking place during an extraordinary session. Mention is made of their participation in an event the previous morning alongside other politicians, which points to regular social and political activity.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at the actions of the absent rapporteur (Evelin Poolamets) and her parliamentary group, highlighting the procedural failure and lack of preparation. The speaker asks pointedly why the absence was not disclosed beforehand and demands an apology should the absence prove to be intentional.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is rigorous, setting their own faction's (Eesti 200) exemplary practice of member substitution as the standard. The speaker references colleagues from other factions (Riina Solman, Vadim Belobrovtsev) in connection with a joint undertaking, demonstrating an awareness of inter-parliamentary communication.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The topic of public health is addressed within the social sector, clarifying that the isolation rules currently in effect in Estonia for close contacts are not active. This subject was handled factually, referencing the recommendations of the Health Board, in order to refute the justification provided for absence.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus at the moment is purely procedural, concentrating on managing the Riigikogu session and resolving the absence of the rapporteur. The main goal is to ensure the effective continuation of the sitting and avoid unnecessary debate.
2 Speeches Analyzed