By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The rhetorical style is sharp, accusatory, and forceful, particularly concerning the government's inaction and failure to deliver on promises. It employs both logical argumentation (citing outdated legislation) and a powerful emotional appeal, characterizing the situation as humiliating for Estonians. The speaker expresses outright distrust regarding the deadlines set by the minister.

The style is formal and respectful, especially when addressing Ülle Madise, who is praised. However, the general tone is worried and critical, describing the situation as "perverse." Value-based appeals (the honor of the language, dignity) and a rhetorical question are used to emphasize the seriousness of the problem.

The tone is predominantly critical, demanding, and urgent, especially directed at the government and the coalition, accusing them of making "unfunded promises." It employs both logical arguments (specific figures, deadlines) and emotional appeals, warning of societal stress and a teacher shortage. The style is formal yet direct, emphasizing the necessity of immediate action.