By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The style is formal and deferential towards the Chancellor of Justice, opening with strong praise for his prior work. At the same time, the tone is critical and apprehensive concerning the operations of state-owned enterprises, utilizing logical argumentation centered on consumer fatigue and financial intimidation. The address is framed as a question, seeking confirmation of a systemic issue.

The rhetorical style is formal and ceremonial, utilizing historical narrative (storytelling) to emphasize the significance of the struggle for freedom. The appeal is strongly emotional and patriotic, focusing on national resistance and facilitating escape from the Red Terror. The speech concludes with a direct question to the minister regarding its recognition.

The tone is critical yet formal and logical, concentrating on procedural matters and accountability issues. Strong rhetoric is employed to describe the problems caused by the state (e.g., "an insensitive and incomprehensible monster"), while simultaneously highlighting the moral effect of this failure on young people. The presenter favors logical argumentation and demands concrete solutions, suggesting they "temper the hype a little" regarding the development of e-exams.