By Months: Mihkel Lees

The speaker demonstrates expertise in social affairs and local government issues, drawing on their previous five years of work as Deputy Mayor for the social sector in Tartu. To support their arguments, they use specific historical examples (the Kase Street residential area, the Ilmatsalu rehabilitation service) and facts to debunk fears regarding safety and security. Their expertise also extends to matters of internal security and critical infrastructure readiness.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of financing national defense and internal security, clearly differentiating between military defense and civil protection. They utilize specific terminology within the context of the budget and budget strategy, referencing cabinet discussions and the constraints on the state's purse strings. The expertise is primarily focused on the analysis of national priority setting.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the fields of crisis preparedness, civil protection, and the systematization of legislation. This expertise is substantiated by a detailed analysis of the four main amendments to the draft bill, including the establishment of a unified framework and the concretization of the role of local authorities. The expertise is further supported by a reference to previous experience as Deputy Mayor of Tartu.

The speaker demonstrates profound competence in European Union law (directives) and its transposition into Estonian law, referencing specific regulations and statutes. Their knowledge of the procedural proceedings of the Riigikogu Social Affairs Committee is particularly robust, including meeting dates, participants, and detailed voting results. In their presentation, they rely on the positions of experts from various ministries and the Department of Public Health.

The speaker demonstrates interest in the topics of administrative efficiency (reducing bureaucracy) and environmental sustainability. They are capable of connecting these two subjects within the context of future political proposals. Technical terminology or data that would suggest deep professional expertise is absent.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in public health and the interpretation of scientific data, citing studies compiled on the Health Board's website. They use specific statistics regarding the lack of physical activity among children, noting that less than half get sufficient exercise (at least 60 minutes a day).

The speaker demonstrates a deep understanding of the social security and family benefits sector, clearly differentiating between the flaws of the old survivor's pension system and the benefits of the new survivor's allowance. He uses specific financial data (e.g., 186 euros vs 345 euros) and statistics (nearly 90% of the target group benefits) to justify the necessity of the change.

The speaker demonstrates authority in the regulation of European Union law harmonization, product safety, and accreditation activities. They utilize technical terminology and provide detailed information concerning the procedural progress, technical amendments, and the rationale for postponing the effective date. This expertise is further evident in the consideration given to stakeholder feedback (such as the Estonian Forensic Science Institute) and the preparation requirements of the Estonian Accreditation Centre.