By Plenary Sessions: Maris Lauri
Total Sessions: 31
Fully Profiled: 31
2025-10-13
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
In his committee work, the speaker emphasizes the importance of consensus-based decisions and cooperation with the Ministry of Finance in developing the budget information system. On a personal level, he advises colleagues who don't understand things to ask others, referencing his own practice when dealing with other topics.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The necessity of deepening cooperation between businesses and universities in research and development is emphasized in order to bridge the gap between the theoretical and practical aspects. When addressing social problems (such as returning to the labor market), the role of the community, family, and friends, alongside the state, is highlighted.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
The collaboration style within the commission is consensus-based, where decisions concerning the return of the draft bill and the appointment of a representative were made unanimously. The speaker emphasizes the commitment to openness, inviting all interested parties and institutions (e.g., the Financial Supervision Authority) who wish to participate in the new discussion.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The speaker is actively seeking collaboration, approaching a colleague with a question to gather input on the topics for the new procedural phase of the anti-money laundering draft bill. This demonstrates a willingness to consider critical feedback and involve others in the refinement process.
2025-09-11
15th Riigikogu, 6th plenary sitting
The speaker emphasized the positive and necessary cooperation in the fight against financial fraud, highlighting the unified commitment of the Financial Supervisory Authority, the Bank of Estonia, the police, the IT sector, and other institutions. Communication with the head of the Financial Supervisory Authority is respectful and collegial.
2025-06-18
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The working style is consensual, as all procedural decisions necessary for the bill's advancement (including placing it on the agenda and concluding the first reading) were made unanimously by the Finance Committee.
2025-06-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the consensus-based cooperation within the Finance Committee, where all decisions regarding the further handling of the draft bill were adopted unanimously. He/She highlights the successful collaboration with the Data Protection Inspectorate (DPI), based on whose recommendations the scope of personal data processing in the bill was significantly narrowed. The speaker also stresses that various parties (the Chancellor of Justice, the Auditor General) were involved in the processing of the draft bill.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The speaker emphasizes the nature of coalition governments and the necessity of consensus, which is also reflected in the Estonian Constitution. In its work, the committee demonstrated a willingness to cooperate with stakeholders, taking into account the recommendation of the Chamber of Service Economy to introduce a technical regulatory amendment. Although most of Isamaa’s proposed amendments were rejected, one of them was substantively considered.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The cooperative approach is institutional, seeking dialogue with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to resolve a complex legislative situation. The goal is to obtain the assessment of the highest court in order to resolve the dilemma faced by the members of the Riigikogu.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Speaker A stresses the consensus-based decision-making process during the handling of the Money Laundering Prevention Act, noting that all committee decisions were unanimous. Speaker B, however, points out that the vote on the second draft bill was split (6 in favor, 3 against), which indicates strong disagreement on tax matters. Speaker C highlights the majority held by the ruling coalition and the unity among the right-wing parties.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The collaborative approach emphasizes consensus decisions on procedural matters, such as placing the draft bill on the agenda and appointing the representative of the lead committee (Maris Lauri). The substantive decision to reject the draft bill was also reached with a clear majority, demonstrating a strong unified front within the committee.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The Commission's work demonstrated consensus on procedural matters (adopting the agenda, appointing a representative), but there was clear disagreement on the substantive issue (the rejection of the draft bill), with the majority (6 in favor, 2 against) deciding to reject the bill.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker adopts an advisory style, urging colleagues to make carefully considered decisions and to await the threat assessment prepared by the security agencies. He/She stresses the necessity of evaluating all aspects (pedestrian movement, trains, border crossing point operating hours) before making a decision, which indicates an openness to comprehensive analysis.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The collaborative approach emphasizes the need for broad-based inclusion when amending the State Budget Act, referencing the government's plan to involve various support groups and stakeholders in the preparation of a comprehensive reform. Regarding the specific, superficial draft bill, there is absolutely no willingness to cooperate, as it is deemed unsuitable for initiating discussion.
2024-12-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker refers to a previous cooperation offer in which the Centre Party and Isamaa refused to support or merge their proposals with the already adopted Bill 511, thereby demonstrating the opponents' rejection of substantive engagement. Cooperation is viewed as possible only if it leads to a meaningful and well-thought-out outcome.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The collaborative style emphasizes that the budget is a compromise among three parties, and the constitution requires joint effort. The constructive input of the opposition is acknowledged to a limited extent—citing, for instance, the change in funding for the Estonian Book Year—but the preference is for substantive debate rather than irresponsible behavior.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The collaborative approach was open to stakeholders (including the Chamber of Commerce and Industry and trade unions) and the Ministry of Finance, with whom the proposed amendments were discussed and prepared. The committee's decisions concerning the substantive specifics of the draft legislation largely received consensus support. However, the proposals put forth by Isamaa did not receive support from the committee.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
It works closely with the Finance Committee and the Ministry of Finance, emphasizing technical consultation during the implementation of amendments. It recognizes the budget as a compromise among coalition partners. It is open to future broad-based discussions regarding the reform of the basic budget law, but requires that proposals be substantive and procedurally correct.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker calls for substantive cooperation and dialogue with the opposition in order to jointly find solutions for improving the budgetary system. He/She emphasizes the need to come together and engage in discussion so that they can genuinely cooperate in the interest of making things better.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The speaker emphasizes the good conduct and substantive role fulfillment required of both the coalition and the opposition for a democratic system to function properly. In this specific situation, however, the style is demanding, instructing the opposition to attend committee work and engage in substantive tasks, which points to the current lack of cooperation.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
It calls for constructive cooperation within the Riigikogu, stressing that improvements can always be achieved through sitting down, deliberation, and debate. It highlights successful international cooperation with democratic nations (Baltic, Scandinavian, Great Britain) in ensuring security, which resulted in a small victory during the IPU vote.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker stresses the urgent need to restore the Riigikogu's capacity for discussion and to seek balance and compromises among various interests. Cooperation, inclusion, and listening to others are presented as the cornerstones for upholding constitutionality and ensuring the internal stability of society. Hope is expressed that they will be more willing to seek compromises going forward.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The collaborative approach was consensual and inclusive, emphasizing that all procedural decisions within the Finance Committee were made unanimously. It was noted that market participants found the draft bill's solutions appropriate, as no amendments or comments were received from them. The cooperation also involved resolving technical and linguistic issues prior to the third reading.
2024-06-13
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker stresses the necessity of constructive collaboration between relevant institutions, government bodies, and the private sector. They reference the collective consensus reached in the Riigikogu concerning the social account issue, indicating a willingness to pursue consensual and shared solutions.
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker sincerely hopes that responsibility will emerge in the Riigikogu and the government, and that common ground and substantive solutions will be found during the budget crisis. However, he expresses strong skepticism and distrust regarding the capability of the other parties, fearing that common ground will not be found. Cooperation is driven by necessity, not trust.
2024-05-30
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The speaker urges cooperation in the swift handling of the supplementary budget, requesting that other members of the Riigikogu refrain from obstructing this vital process. He stresses that in the current crisis, we should focus on finding a solution rather than assigning blame. He addresses his colleagues and fellow speakers respectfully, even while sharply criticizing those responsible for past actions.
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The collaborative approach is open to interest groups and the Ministry of Finance, engaging them via public hearings and consensually considering several proposed amendments (e.g., extending the transition period). It openly acknowledges the internal commission discussion and disagreements (the majority and minority positions concerning the Council's requirement), but ultimately stresses the rationality of the solutions supported by the majority.
2024-05-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session
The speaker expresses hope that important issues will receive more thorough consideration going forward in the Riigikogu committees, ministries, and at the government level, indicating a desire for constructive cooperation. Colleagues are addressed respectfully, and the work that has been done is acknowledged, even if it does not yield immediate results. The goal of this cooperation is to find solutions for improving the business environment.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The style of cooperation is markedly consensual and inclusive, emphasizing that all decisions within the Finance Committee were adopted by consensus. Furthermore, the standard involvement of stakeholders in the work of the Riigikogu committee is stressed, allowing them to express opinions and verify the resolution of issues.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
In procedural matters (concerning the draft budget of constitutional institutions), the Finance Committee reached consensus decisions, which indicates the capacity to find agreements. However, the government and the opposition are simultaneously being called upon to demonstrate broader collective responsibility in resolving the budget crisis.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style of cooperation is open and institutional, involving experts from the Ministry of Finance and the Financial Supervisory Authority. Decisions within the committee were reached by a large consensus (8 votes in favor and 1 vote against), which points to successful collaboration within the lead committee. He/She specifically names the colleagues and officials who participated in the discussion.