Agenda Profile: Maris Lauri
Second reading of the Draft Act amending the State Budget Act (391 SE)
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Political Position
The political position centers on amending the State Budget Act to ensure that when the budgets of constitutional institutions are approved, both the economic forecast and the current state of public finances are taken into account. This stance is highly procedural and policy-driven, emphasizing the necessity of achieving budget balance and clearly identifying the sources for covering expenditures. The speaker supports the further processing of draft bill 391 SE in order to formalize the procedure for making budgetary decisions into law.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough expertise regarding the procedural rules of the Riigikogu and the operations of the Finance Committee, explaining the details of Draft Bill 391 SE and the substance of the proposed amendments. Specific terminology is employed, such as "macroeconomic forecast" and "sources of coverage," and reference is made to Article 100 of the Constitution, which indicates legal authority. The expertise focuses on the legal and economic correctness of the budget procedure.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and informative, focusing on the detailed reporting of the finance committee's work process and decisions. The discourse is logic-based, avoiding emotional appeals and employing clear, technical language to describe the procedure. The overall tone is factual and purposeful, aimed at establishing procedural clarity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The activity patterns demonstrate active participation in the work of the Finance Committee, citing three sessions (April 4, 18, and 30) dedicated to discussing the draft bill. The speaker is involved in planning the parliamentary agenda, making proposals regarding the dates for the second reading and the final vote (May 8 and 15). The activity is focused on managing the legislative process and reporting the results.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is no direct opposition or criticism. The speaker is analyzing the opinion of the Government of the Republic, clarifying why certain government recommendations (e.g., the requirement for government presence) did not need to be added to the statute, as the corresponding right is already guaranteed in the Constitution.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation is consensus-based and compromise-driven, emphasizing that all decisions made by the Finance Committee regarding the further processing of the draft bill were reached by consensus. Cooperation was also undertaken with the Government, taking into account their fundamental support and conditions for amending the draft bill, specifically to include the requirement to consider the economic forecast.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal responsibility and budgetary discipline, requiring that economic forecasts and state budget balance indicators be taken into account when approving the budgets of constitutional institutions. The principle is supported that when expenditures are increased, the corresponding sources of funding must always be identified, which indicates a commitment to conservative fiscal policy.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus centers on amendments to the State Budget Act (Bill 391 SE), specifically concerning the procedure for approving the budgets of constitutional institutions. The presenter is leading and supporting the bill's process, ensuring that the Finance Committee's proposed amendments legally mandate taking the economic forecast into account. The objective is to bring the bill forward for the final vote on May 15th.
1 Speeches Analyzed