By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The rhetorical style is sharp and combative, utilizing irony ("stagnation is progress") and challenging the government through the use of questions. The tone is critical and concerned, highlighting how Estonia is lagging behind its neighbors. The appeal is primarily logical and data-driven, relying on international rankings and economic facts.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, challenging the minister's assertions and labeling them outright lies. Logical arguments are employed, grounded in practical examples (apartment association utility bills, waste disposal costs for cemeteries) and highlighting the emphasis on increased bureaucracy. Strong imagery is utilized, comparing the system to a planned economy and dubbing the draft bill a "tangle" or "mess."

The rhetorical style is confrontational, accusatory, and emotionally charged, especially concerning allegations of theft and abuse of power. The speaker begins with a humorous or nostalgic anecdote (the sprat sandwich) to undermine the previous speaker's narrative, but quickly shifts to sharp, moral accusations directed at the government.