Session Profile: Arvo Aller

15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session

2025-05-13

Political Position
The political position is firmly against the judicial administration reform, viewing it as a cunning ploy to shift responsibility and facilitate the closure of regional courthouses. The criticism targets the government’s hidden agenda and is primarily outcome-based, stressing the negative impact on regional services. The speaker is concerned that the minister will be able to politely recuse himself from decisions regarding the shutting down of courts.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise concerning the administrative structure of the courts and the specifics of the law's entry into force, referencing precise dates and the role of the new administrative council. Specific terminology, such as the "Administrative and Development Council," is employed, and the link between the reduction in budgetary resources and the closure of courthouses is highlighted. Furthermore, they are aware of the number of parliamentary representatives on the council.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is suspicious, insistent, and confrontational, focusing on calling into question the minister's motives and the use of an accelerated procedure. Strong expressions like "cunning trick" are employed, and parallels are drawn with other unpopular decisions (such as the closure of rural schools). The speaker presents their views resolutely and makes direct negative predictions about the consequences of the law.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data indicates participation in the plenary session held on May 13, 2025, during which repeated questions were put to the minister concerning the Courts Administration Act. The speaker is aware of the Riigikogu's session schedule, referencing the upcoming recess week. Data regarding other activity patterns is currently unavailable.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for the reform's hidden objectives and accelerated procedure. The criticism is both political and procedural, accusing the minister of reducing accountability for regional decisions. The speaker is certain that the reform's goal is the closure of courts in the regions.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker supports broad cooperation within the administrative council, stressing the need to involve all political parties represented in parliament. At the same time, he/she criticizes the current situation where the political will for such broad-based cooperation is lacking.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
A strong regional focus, which is manifested in concern over the closure of regional courthouses due to the reduction of budgetary resources. The speaker stresses that the reform provides a mechanism for moving the decision-making level away from the regions. This regional concern is amplified by drawing a parallel with the closure of small rural schools.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic arguments are implicit, focusing on the concern that the reduction of budgetary resources is the main driver for closing regional courthouses. The speaker suggests that the lack of money and staff in the budget is merely a pretext for consolidating services.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Among the social topics addressed is the issue of education, where the closure of rural schools is used as an analogy highlighting concerns about the diminishing availability of public services in the regions. The primary social concern, however, is related to the accessibility of justice at the regional level.

2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
Legislative attention is centered on opposing the Court Administration Act, particularly its implementation via an expedited procedure. The speaker is an opponent of the measure, criticizing the speed of the law's entry into force (with certain sections taking effect on June 1, 2025) and its potential negative consequences, namely the closure of courthouses.

2 Speeches Analyzed