Session Profile: Arvo Aller
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting
2025-09-15
Political Position
The political platform is strongly opposed to tax increases, particularly concerning the land tax, which he/she believes damages agricultural producers and jeopardizes food security. He/She criticizes the government's inertia and past procedural errors in passing legislation, demanding a more substantive approach. He/She highlights EKRE's role in reducing land tax rates in local municipalities, thereby establishing a clear counter-position to the government's overall tax policy. The political focus is centered on supporting agriculture and addressing regional issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the Land Tax Act and land valuation processes, citing percentage caps on increases (50%, 10%) and the history of assessment. They possess detailed knowledge of the hardships faced by agricultural producers and matters of food security, as well as the specific features of taxing leased land and commercial revenue land. Furthermore, they are up-to-date on the regulatory confusion surrounding the classification of wild and domestic animals (red deer, ear tags).
4 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker’s rhetorical style is critical, straightforward, and at times combative, particularly when addressing government inaction and tax policy. They employ strong logical arguments (for example, the land tax increases production costs) alongside emotional appeals (highlighting the difficult situation of farmers and the quality of the harvest). Specific examples and references to local events and journalism (Virumaa Teataja) are utilized.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker actively submits and follows up on interpellations, utilizing this mechanism to accelerate government action and obtain clarification. He submitted an inquiry regarding the topic of red deer on June 16th and pursued it further during the September plenary session, demonstrating a systematic approach to resolving specific issues.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main opponents are the current and previous governments (including the Social Democrats), who are being criticized for removing land tax restrictions and providing insufficient support to farmers. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, accusing the government of being ready to take money away from farmers. Officials and politicians who vote for laws without delving into the substance are also being criticized.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The speaker is focusing heavily on regional issues, specifically highlighting land tax questions in the merging municipalities of Jõhvi and Toila. Furthermore, the concerns of agricultural producers in North Estonia (Kunda, Viru-Nigula) regarding red deer are being emphasized, citing local media reports.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
His economic views are strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially concerning agricultural land, as this directly impacts the cost price of agricultural production. He criticizes the state policy that forces local governments to raise taxes and calls for national support for farmers to guarantee food security. He views lowering the land tax at the local government level as a positive solution.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is not enough data.
4 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is aimed at reinstating the restrictions of the Land Tax Act and establishing regulatory clarity among relevant agencies (e.g., the Land and Spatial Planning Board, the Environmental Board). It uses parliamentary inquiries to expedite investigative work and guarantee compensation for damages incurred by agricultural producers and those cultivating young forest stands.
4 Speeches Analyzed