Session Profile: Arvo Aller
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
2025-09-08
Political Position
The political stance is vehemently opposed to the tightening of beekeeping subsidy conditions, which excludes small-scale producers with fewer than 16 bee colonies. This approach is policy- and results-driven, emphasizing the negative impact of these cuts on the agricultural sector and producer cooperation. The speaker stresses the importance of making subsidies accessible to all beekeepers, regardless of the number of hives they maintain.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough technical expertise regarding agricultural subsidies, referencing specific requirements (e.g., 16 bee colonies for hive support and 10 colonies for foraging area support) and the operation of the PRIA register. He/She is also familiar with practical issues such as planning plant protection activities, the threat of counterfeit honey, and the reduction in honey yield due to unfavorable weather conditions.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is professional, concerned, and well-reasoned, focusing on the logical consequences that regulatory changes entail (e.g., difficulties in planning plant protection activities). Formal parliamentary language is used, and direct questions are posed to the minister to obtain feedback and clarification regarding the decisions that have been made.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker demonstrates long-term and consistent activity, referencing the submission of a query in April 2025, which indicates that the topic has been kept in focus for several months. He/She actively participates in the plenary session, asking follow-up questions and commenting on the minister's responses.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed at the government's/ministry's actions, which led to the tightening of support conditions due to budget cuts. The opposition is policy-based, criticizing the decision-making process where the sector was presented with a fait accompli, and emphasizing that the cuts harm small-scale beekeepers and cooperation between producers.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cooperation between beekeepers and crop growers, noting that the previous PRIA registration system facilitated this communication when planning plant protection work. He hopes for future improvements to the regulations so that all beekeepers can receive support.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is directed towards national agricultural policy and Estonia's primary sector, particularly beekeepers and honey production. The need to protect Estonian honey from imported fake honey is emphasized, which points to the high value placed on local production.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports subsidizing small producers, viewing the grants as significant motivation and additional income, even when the subsidy amounts are marginal. He/She acknowledges that operating as a sole proprietor (FIE) or a private limited company (OÜ) generates tax revenue for the state, but criticizes cuts that harm small operators. Furthermore, he/she points out the immediate deduction of income tax from grants given to private individuals.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on agricultural support regulations, particularly the conditions for beekeeping support and foraging area support, as well as PRIA registration obligations. The speaker opposes the recent restrictive changes and has initiated inquiries, seeking to ensure the availability of support to all beekeepers.
3 Speeches Analyzed