Session Profile: Arvo Aller
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
2024-07-15
Political Position
The political position is strongly oppositional, centered on criticizing constitutional conformity and the integrity of legislative procedures. The speaker firmly rejects the specific bill (referring to the car tax) in any shape or form, deeming its justification unfounded. This is a value-based stance, underscoring the necessity of upholding constitutionality and criticizing the government’s arbitrary policy decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates proficiency in legislative procedures, particularly concerning judicial review of constitutionality and the role of the Constitutional Committee. The speaker specifically inquires whether it would have been prudent to seek a supplementary opinion from the committee following the proposed amendments. Comparative examples drawn from the tax policies of other European states and Estonian e-voting are used to criticize the arbitrary nature of the government's decisions.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharp and confrontational, accusing the rapporteur of defending coalition partners and justifying a law that violates the constitution. Rhetorical questions and logical argumentation are employed to highlight procedural errors and the law's inconsistency. The tone is formal, but distinctly critical and oppositional.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and the rapporteur, who stand accused of ramming through legislation that violates the constitution. The criticism is both procedural (the failure to consult the Constitutional Committee) and substantive (the actual opposition to the law). This opposition is intense and principled, ruling out support for the legislation in any shape or form.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
It demonstrates cooperation within its political group, confirming Rene Kokk's statements and their shared opposition to the law. There is a complete lack of any indication of readiness to compromise with the opposition or engage in cross-party cooperation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus lies on national legislative matters, such as guaranteeing constitutional compliance and tax policy. International comparison (specifically European countries) is employed to critique Estonia's political choices, yet there is no focus on specific regional issues.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It expresses strong opposition to the introduction of the new tax obligation (the car tax), emphasizing that while money is needed, this does not justify taking measures that contravene the constitution. The economic viewpoints are framed primarily as legal and procedural criticism.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is centered on opposing the specific bill (the car tax) and demanding constitutional review. The speaker demands that the Constitutional Committee, acting as the guardian of the legislative process, issue a new opinion on the constitutionality of the law following the proposed amendments.
2 Speeches Analyzed