Session Profile: Arvo Aller
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
2024-04-01
Political Position
The speaker holds a strongly value-based and nationalistic political position, stressing the prioritization of Estonian citizens in both labor policy and the provision of foreign aid. He calls for public involvement in crucial social issues, specifically criticizing the failure to hold a referendum on the redefinition of marriage. This political stance is characterized by sharp criticism directed at the government's actions and procedural decisions.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the Riigikogu’s procedural rules, criticizing the work of the Presidium regarding the scheduling of interpellations and verifying the attendance of presenters. Furthermore, he/she maintains a specific focus on the shortcomings of labor policy and the regulation governing the brokering of workforce from third countries. He/She also addresses national security issues, such as the requirement to certify one's mobilization obligation when applying for a residence permit.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is predominantly critical, demanding, and at times confrontational, particularly when responding to inquiries. The speaker employs rhetorical techniques to cast doubt on the respondent's knowledge, noting that "Answering a question with a question doesn't demonstrate much awareness." They utilize both logical arguments (procedural errors) and emotional appeals (raising children is hard work).
6 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker is active during Riigikogu sessions, frequently posing questions to those responding to formal inquiries, suggesting a strong focus on government scrutiny. They participate in discussions touching upon social policy, labor issues, and the internal organization of the parliament itself.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is aimed both at the Riigikogu Board for procedural deficiencies and at government ministers who wish to import labor from outside Estonia. The speaker criticizes the respondents for their vague answers and lack of awareness, while simultaneously rejecting the accusation that EKRE is not helping Ukraine. He expresses strong opposition to circumventing a referendum on the marriage issue.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speeches contain no reference to cooperation or a willingness to compromise with other political parties. The speaker instead represents and defends the positions of their own party (EKRE), demanding clear political plans and answers from the opposing side.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly on national and international topics, including the protection of the Estonian labor market and the provision of foreign aid to Ukraine. A specific local or regional focus does not emerge from the speeches.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The speaker supports ensuring employment for Estonia's own people and opposes the import of labor from outside the country. They emphasize the role of trade unions in wage negotiations and demand control over labor leasing companies registered outside Estonia. Furthermore, they consider the benefit paid for raising children to be justified and crucial for providing a sense of security.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker is strongly opposed to redefining the concept of marriage to include same-sex unions and demands that this issue be resolved via a national referendum. They emphasize the importance of ensuring security and public order, demanding that residence permit applicants provide proof that they are not subject to military mobilization. Furthermore, they consider the accurate and mandatory inclusion of nationality data in official documents to be essential.
6 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on the areas of immigration and security, requiring that proof of the absence of mobilization duty be made mandatory as a prerequisite for obtaining a residence permit. Another priority is bringing temporary staffing agencies under control and tightening regulations.
6 Speeches Analyzed