Session Profile: Arvo Aller
XV Riigikogu, V Session, Plenary Sitting
2025-06-16
Political Position
The political stance centers on strong opposition to amendments to the Waste Act, particularly the introduction of a new waste management cost fee, which is viewed as a hidden tax hike. The criticism is aimed at the state shifting its responsibilities onto local municipalities and worsening the financial situation of the populace. The speaker frames the government's actions as both ineffective and increasing bureaucracy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of waste management logistics (the number of containers and vehicles) as well as administrative and accounting specifics (separate accounting for local governments (KOV) and the methodology for calculating the 50% fee). Technical terms like "separately collected packaging" are employed, and the impact analysis of the draft legislation is cited to support arguments concerning increased bureaucracy.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, challenging the minister's assertions and labeling them outright lies. Logical arguments are employed, grounded in practical examples (apartment association utility bills, waste disposal costs for cemeteries) and highlighting the emphasis on increased bureaucracy. Strong imagery is utilized, comparing the system to a planned economy and dubbing the draft bill a "tangle" or "mess."
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is too little data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government who introduced the bill, criticizing their assertions that no new taxes would be introduced, along with the overall consequences of the policy. The criticism is intense, focusing on the policy's impracticality and the resulting increase in administrative burden. The speaker clearly supports the motion to reject the draft bill.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The style of cooperation demonstrates the unity of the intra-factional opposition, as the speaker aligns themselves with the rejection statement issued by the faction of the Estonian Conservative People's Party. There is no reference to cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is on local governments (LOs) and their financial and administrative burden, stressing that the state is effectively pushing its obligations onto the LOs. Specific problems concerning the management of apartment associations and cemeteries are also highlighted.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic stance is strongly fiscally conservative, opposing any fee increases that undermine people's ability to cope and make them "even more poorer." There is also criticism directed at the growth of bureaucracy and administrative costs resulting from the introduction of new IT solutions and the hiring of specialists, all funded at the expense of waste management.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Social issues raise concerns regarding potential disputes within apartment associations between residents who generate varying amounts of waste, as well as general worry about the financial well-being of the Estonian people and the rising cost of living.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The legislative focus is directed toward opposing and rejecting the draft amendment to the Waste Act. The speaker is acting as a strong opponent of the bill, highlighting its shortcomings, particularly concerning the establishment of a new waste management cost fee and centrally planned target levels.
3 Speeches Analyzed