Session Profile: Arvo Aller

15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

2025-06-12

Political Position
The political position is strongly anti-government and results-oriented, focusing on the ethical and legal evaluation of the government's activities. The speaker sharply criticizes the government's inability to hold "their own people" accountable (e.g., the Lehtme, Pihlakodu cases) and accuses the government of arbitrary rule over the Estonian people. This stance is strongly oppositional and value-based, demanding accountability.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates awareness of recent corruption and financial crime cases that have garnered widespread public interest, specifically highlighting Johanna-Maria Lehtme's theft of 6 million euros and the Pihlakodu case. Furthermore, the speaker uses personal memories (Kohtla-Järve 1st Secondary School) to illustrate the theme of accountability and establishing the truth.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is confrontational, accusatory, and emotionally charged, especially concerning allegations of theft and abuse of power. The speaker begins with a humorous or nostalgic anecdote (the sprat sandwich) to undermine the previous speaker's narrative, but quickly shifts to sharp, moral accusations directed at the government.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker participated in the Riigikogu plenary session debate on the motion of no confidence, posing a pointed question to the minister regarding the government's activities.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary confrontation is directed at the government and the minister facing a vote of no confidence, who is accused of applying double standards and protecting their allies. The criticism is intense and focuses on the ethical failure brought to light through specific individuals (Lehtme) and cases, thereby calling the government's legitimacy into question.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Insufficient data. (The discourse is purely oppositional and accusatory; there are no signs pointing toward cooperation.)

1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The regional focus is briefly mentioned through Kohtla-Järve 1st Secondary School, which ties into a personal memory concerning the theme of responsibility. The political focus, however, is distinctly national, addressing corruption and the abuse of power at the level of the Estonian people and the state.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There are no specific economic views, but there is strong opposition to widespread financial dishonesty and the theft of funds, exemplified by the 6 million euro sum in the Lehtme case. This indicates concern over the misappropriation of state funds or donations.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The address focuses on social justice and the government's accountability to the Estonian people, emphasizing the necessity of putting an end to the abuse of power. The subject of education is briefly touched upon, using the example of the Kohtla-Järve school to highlight the critical importance of establishing the truth.

1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on government oversight and accountability procedures, specifically through participation in the debate on the motion of no confidence. Specific bills or legislative priorities are not mentioned; the emphasis is on criticizing the actions of the executive branch.

1 Speeches Analyzed