Agenda Profile: Arvo Aller
Draft law amending the Act on Documents Establishing Identity and amending other acts in consequence (572 SE) – first reading
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Political Position
The political position is strongly opposed to the amendments to the Identity Documents Act (Bill 572 SE). This opposition is value-based, centered on concerns regarding excessive state intervention and the restriction of personal freedoms. In particular, the risk of descending into a "surveillance society" and a "police state" is emphasized due to the planned introduction of mobile identification.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates a detailed understanding of the bill's technical aspects, particularly the capabilities of mobile identification and positioning compared to plastic cards. They also possess specific knowledge of the draft law's provisions, referencing the section that covers name length restrictions (30 characters) and the rules for abbreviation.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is cautious yet insistent, employing strong warnings such as "surveillance society" and "police state." The speaker presents their opposition in the form of questions, highlighting the logical conclusions (traceability, distortion of the name) regarding the dangers arising from the proposed legal amendments. The tone is formal, addressing the chairman of the session and the minister.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The data shows two interventions (questions) during the first reading of the draft Identity Documents Act on a single date (2025-04-09).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The opposition is aimed squarely at the policies of the minister who introduced the draft bill and the government, specifically regarding state oversight and the control of personal data. The criticism is focused on both policy and procedure, directly raising the question of whether the state intends to start dictating the length of a person's name.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The speaker strongly emphasizes civil liberties and privacy, opposing the expansion of state surveillance facilitated by mobile identification. Furthermore, the inviolability of personal identity is defended, criticizing the state's attempts to curtail the length of names and shorten them on official documents.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is opposing the draft amendment to the Identity Documents Act (Bill 572 SE). The speaker is acting as an opponent, focusing on provisions concerning the security of digital identification and the integrity of personal data.
2 Speeches Analyzed