Agenda Profile: Arvo Aller
First Reading of the Draft Act on the Ratification of the Agreement between the Republic of Estonia and the Kingdom of Sweden concerning the Execution of Kingdom of Sweden Prison Sentences in the Republic of Estonia (682 SE)
2025-11-04
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Political Position
The speaker is vehemently opposed to the process of ratifying the agreement concerning the enforcement of prison sentences, calling it a "complete farce" and "utter nonsense." This position stems from procedural criticism, specifically the speaker's assertion that the obligation to ratify already exists under Article 55, thereby making the current debate meaningless. The stance is characterized by strong opposition and procedural critique.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the substance of the document under discussion, specifically citing Article 55, paragraph one, of the agreement and the associated obligation to ratify it. He differentiates between the legal terms "treaty" and "agreement," stressing that the document in question is an agreement. Furthermore, he knowledgeably inquires about the existence of similar agreements involving the following countries of interest: the Netherlands, Denmark, and Belgium.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is strongly critical, skeptical, and condemnatory, employing sharp phrases such as "slick sales pitch," "complete farce," and "utter nonsense." The speaker combines procedural logic (reference to Article 55) with a sharp rhetorical attack against the government's presentation. The tone is formal, yet the substance is confrontational.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
There is insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The primary opposition is aimed at the minister/government who introduced the draft bill, whose presentation is being called a sales pitch. The criticism is procedural, as the debate is considered pointless, and political, demanding clarification regarding the scope of similar future agreements. The opposition is intense and uncompromising.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker demonstrates cooperation with their faction colleague by publicly aligning themselves with Rene Kok's preceding statements. Data on broader, cross-party cooperation is currently unavailable.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on international relations and treaties, addressing the agreement between Estonia and Sweden. Additionally, the speaker expands the focus, inquiring about future treaties with other European countries, such as the Netherlands, Denmark, and Belgium.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
There is insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
There is insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is the opposition to the draft bill (682 SE) concerning the ratification of the agreement on the enforcement of custodial sentences between Estonia and Sweden. The speaker is a strong opponent of the procedure and is demanding clarification regarding subsequent similar agreements involving the Netherlands, Denmark, and Belgium.
1 Speeches Analyzed