Agenda Profile: Arvo Aller
A written demand submitted by 23 members of the Riigikogu for a vote of no confidence in the Minister of Infrastructure, Vladimir Svet.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
Political Position
The political position is strongly value-based, focusing on national security and historical justice. The speaker demands the continued removal of Red Army infrastructure sites and stresses the question of the minister's legitimacy, contingent upon passing a security clearance. The topics of borders and the Tartu Peace Treaty are also strongly raised, specifically questioning the fate of Ivangorod (Jaanilinn).
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding infrastructure policy and the relocation of historical objects, specifically inquiring about the next objects slated for removal. National security procedures are also a focus, with emphasis placed on the speed of the minister's security clearance process. Furthermore, knowledge is shown concerning Estonia's historical borders and the context of the Treaty of Tartu.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The rhetorical style is combative and critical, utilizing direct and sharp questions to challenge the minister's actions and background. An ironic tone is employed, referencing political flip-flopping ("some Center Party members have switched to the Social Democrats before"). The emotional appeal centers on national security and historical memory.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
Data is scarce.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The main confrontation is with the Minister of Infrastructure, who is being criticized on procedural grounds (failure to pass a security clearance) and on value-based grounds (an unclear stance regarding de-Sovietization and borders). The criticism is intense and manifests in direct questioning of the minister’s legitimacy. Furthermore, political instability and party switching are also being criticized.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Data is scarce.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is strongly on the national level (the Estonian streetscape) and the international/historical border issue. Particular emphasis is placed on the fate of Ivangorod (Jaanilinn) and its location along the line established by the Tartu Peace Treaty, which highlights the significance of the eastern border question.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Data is scarce.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Instead of social issues, the focus is strongly placed on historical memory and national security, demanding the removal of Red Army infrastructure objects from the Estonian streetscape. Political identity is also important, referencing the matter of membership or non-membership in the Communist Party.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on holding the executive power accountable and the issue of ministerial confidence, which is linked to motions of no confidence. Specific bills or amendments are not mentioned; the emphasis is on political oversight and security clearance procedures.
2 Speeches Analyzed