By Plenary Sessions: Alar Laneman

The style of cooperation is consensual and institutional. The speaker highlights the consensual decisions made by the National Defence Committee regarding both the completion of the first reading of the bill and the deadline for submitting amendments. Collaboration took place with Minister of Defence Hanno Pevkur, officials from the Ministry of Defence, and the senior leadership of the Defence Forces.

The style of cooperation is constructive and appreciative, praising the Ministry of Defence for its adequate and serious response to the problems. This points to cooperation within the National Defence Committee, which demonstrates a readiness for cross-factional work.

There isn't enough data.

The speaker represents the position of the Reform Party faction, supporting the government's efforts in the area of national defense. He/She calls upon all colleagues in the Riigikogu to support this vital defense decision, citing the desire to achieve a broader consensus on security issues.

The style of cooperation is appreciative and constructive, seeking the minister's advice on how to better conduct the upcoming discussion and make it actionable. The speaker begins their address by acknowledging their colleague.

Emphasis is placed on consensus-based decision-making within the steering committee, and colleagues are thanked for their support of the missions. While the current procedure is defended, we remain open to criticism and proposals aimed at improving the work of the Riigikogu. The approach taken by our good colleague Anti is acknowledged, and a call is made for constructive discussion.

The style of cooperation is consensual and collegial, emphasizing the unanimous decision of the National Defence Committee when processing the draft bill and setting the deadline for amendments. Furthermore, international cooperation involving 23 European Union countries participating in the operation is also highlighted.

The speaker actively promotes cooperation and synergy, viewing it as the foundation of success, especially in constrained environments. He/She is seeking solutions on how to compel relatively autonomous sectors to better consider regional aspects and engage in cooperation with them.

The style of collaboration is constructive and respectful, beginning with praise for the minister's work and subsequently offering suggestions for the action plan in a recommendatory tone. This indicates openness to policy improvement and a readiness to operate within the existing framework.

The collaborative style is appreciative and supportive, commending the minister for the continuous direction of the national defense plan he presented. It demonstrates a readiness for dialogue by raising a question regarding the topic of public debate.

There isn't enough data.

The collaborative style demonstrates support either within the faction or from the opposition bloc, as the speaker is continuing and expanding upon a topic previously raised by their colleague, Ants Frosch. This suggests a shared concern and the coordinated presentation of these issues.

The collaborative style is pragmatic, as the speaker supports the main objective and necessity of the proposal but raises questions regarding procedural details and social risks. This indicates a willingness to support the policy, provided its implementation has been sufficiently well-considered.

Insufficient data.

The collaborative approach is largely confrontational towards the majority, focusing on exposing their procedural and substantive errors. Positive mention is made of good colleague Siim’s position on the issue of trust, which indicates a readiness to support similar value-based viewpoints.

The presenter opens by acknowledging the minister's report ("sympathetic"), suggesting openness, but then sharply focuses on the shortcomings. There is no indication of direct cooperation or a willingness to compromise.

There is not enough data.

The speaker calls upon colleagues to address a serious problem and find solutions, citing collective responsibility at the level of the legislature and the executive branch. He stresses the necessity of sharing Estonia’s security message with European partners, highlighting the importance of international cooperation. He commends the daily excellent work of the personnel of the Police and Border Guard Board, the Defence Forces, and the Defence League, but criticizes the organization of the system.

The speaker appreciates the substantive discussion and constructive cooperation, thanking the Minister and Ministry staff for the successful committee session. He/She is seeking synergy between various sectors (defense and civil defense) to address the concerns of reservists and strengthen the national will to defend.

The speaker directly requested colleagues' support for the submitted draft bill, which indicates a desire to achieve legislative cooperation and consensus regarding his tax proposal.

The reference to a "good colleague" indicates cooperation with members of their own faction in posing questions and criticizing responses. There is no evidence of a broader willingness to compromise or cross-party cooperation.