By Plenary Sessions: Hanah Lahe

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of electoral legislation and the voting practices of European Union member states, referencing a specific number of member states where the voting age is set at 18. This expertise is related to initiating and justifying legislative amendments, using technical language (e.g., "Law on the Election of the European Parliament").

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the confluence of both economic policy (the car tax) and social issues (demographics/birth rate). Their expertise is evident in the rapid identification of the causal relationship presented by the other speaker, and the subsequent demand for clarification, citing a potential logical fallacy.

Profound expertise in the legislative process and environmental policy, particularly in the field of waste management. The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge of the topics discussed by the commission, including waste shipments, metal waste, greenwashing, and the European Union Packaging Regulation. Special emphasis is placed on the chapter concerning digitalization and the problems it is designed to solve.

The speaker is thoroughly versed in the legislative procedure, presenting precise dates and procedural stages (e.g., the timeline for readings and votes). This expertise relates to the technical content of the draft bill and the field of environment/circular economy, as evidenced by cooperation with the Ministry of Climate and the Association of Circular Economy Enterprises.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the content and objectives of sustainability reports, highlighting their three core components (environment, social well-being, economic sustainability). They are well-versed in the legislative procedure, criticizing the draft bill for its insufficient explanatory memorandum and the absence of an impact assessment. Furthermore, they stress the importance of measuring environmental impact for the long-term sustainability of businesses.

The speaker possesses significant expertise in climate and energy policy, particularly regarding the European Union Emissions Trading System (ETS). They highlight the system's financial revenue, which averages 200 million euros annually, and how these funds are utilized for investments. The speaker draws on information provided by experts at the Ministry of Climate and is knowledgeable about international climate targets (China 2060, US policy). Furthermore, they are competent in explaining the work and procedures of the Riigikogu committee.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the shortcomings in the prosecution of sexual offenses, specifically citing the inadequacy of incriminating evidence and the tendency to blame victims in judicial rulings. This specialized knowledge is further evident in the emphasis placed on the necessity of a consent law (the consent law).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in artificial intelligence and digitalization, specifically connecting these topics to environmental management. Furthermore, they attest to the viability of technical solutions (such as language learning apps), suggesting a high degree of comfort in utilizing digital tools.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge concerning public health indicators (life expectancy, infant birth weight) and specific environmental impacts (infrasound, noise, oil shale pollution). Data-driven arguments are employed regarding the health status of Ida-Virumaa, which points to expertise in environmental and health policy. Furthermore, technical comparative data is being sought regarding noise and infrasound levels from other fields.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the geographical manifestations of climate change in Southern Europe, mentioning specific phenomena such as heatwaves, droughts, and wildfires in Spain, Italy, and Portugal. They are capable of linking environmental problems with broader security issues, referring to climate change as a security threat. Furthermore, the speaker is aware of the context surrounding the draft Electricity Market Act.

The speaker demonstrates authority in their detailed knowledge of the work of the environmental commission and waste legislation (including the Packaging Act, hazardous waste, and the deposit-refund regulation). The expertise is both procedural and substantive, allowing them to accurately describe the seven proposed amendments. At the same time, a lack of knowledge regarding the technical implementation of supervision is acknowledged, as this was not directly discussed by the commission.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise regarding climate policy, European Union regulations, and the legislative framework. Specific terms and concepts are utilized, such as "Planetary boundaries," "carbon budget," and "the principle of just transition." This expertise is grounded in scientific information and the practical application of climate legislation in other countries (e.g., Finland).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in hunting regulations and financial aspects, citing specific figures regarding the number of hunters, the percentage of pensioners, and potential revenue loss. They rely on assessments provided by experts from the Ministry of Climate, differentiating hunting from fishing based on the complexity and cost involved in these activities. This expertise is closely tied to the legislative process and the utilization of data.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of the widespread impact of climate change ("far-reaching impact") on the functioning of the state and people's fundamental rights. He/She also recognizes the role of the Chancellor of Justice in highlighting systemic threats and emphasizes the need for wise decisions.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of international events, referencing the floods and casualty figures that occurred in Poland and the Czech Republic. They also recognize the connection between the climate crisis and extreme weather conditions. Specific terminology, such as "natural disaster situation," is employed, and reference is made to the availability of EU funds for providing subsidy payments.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of environmental law and waste management, addressing specific topics such as the register of producer responsibility products and the food waste utilization hierarchy. He/She is well acquainted with the procedural processes of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament) committees, referencing protocols and discussion details (e.g., the use of animal feed).

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding electoral law, youth political participation, and international standards, citing the stances of the OECD, the UN, and the Council of Europe. Concrete statistical data is utilized concerning youth voter turnout (comparing 16–17-year-olds versus 18–24-year-olds) and their representation in the European Parliament and the Riigikogu. This expertise is further highlighted by the mention of historical precedents (the 1937 Constitution) and legal consultations (with the Chancellor of Justice and the Ministry of Justice).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in climate policy, the circular economy, and the energy sector. Concrete investment figures are utilized (for example, 155 million euros for green energy production and 160 million for residential building renovation), and emphasis is placed on achieving legal certainty through legislation. Key technical terms highlighted include the circular economy, emission reduction, and the shift toward renewable energy.

The speaker demonstrates profound knowledge of water management and the global water crisis, utilizing specific statistical data (e.g., 1% accessible fresh water) and projections (consumption growth in Estonia by 2040). They reference data from the Ministry of Climate and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 6, 9, 12, 14), emphasizing a technical and scientific approach.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in environmental education, emphasizing the need for its quality, integration, and widespread accessibility. The subject is directly related to managing climate change and the role of education in tackling future challenges.

The speaker demonstrates competence in both environmental law (specifically the Water Act) and the procedural rules of the Riigikogu, providing a detailed account of the committee's proceedings. The use of specific terminology, such as amendments "of a normative-technical nature," points to a detailed understanding of the bill's substance and its technical organization. This expertise is linked to the work of the Environment Committee and the activities of the Ministry of Climate.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the international dimension of climate policy, emphasizing its connections with foreign diplomacy. A specific international treaty (the Paris Climate Agreement) is mentioned, and it is stressed that the climate crisis is a global problem.

The expertise is demonstrated by the understanding of mechanisms related to political conflicts and the spread of disinformation on social media. Furthermore, knowledge of previous litigation and their outcomes is referenced, specifically mentioning the court battle lost against EKRE.

The text establishes authority in environmental and climate matters by mentioning the completion of a Master’s degree in Environmental Management. It demonstrates a strong understanding of committee procedures and legislative details, referencing the Climate Ministry’s development plans and issues related to the Subsoil Act.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of environmental law and water management, citing specific topics such as the demand for water reuse and water usage permits. The expertise is institutional, relying on input provided to the commission by officials and the minister of the Ministry of Climate.