By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

The key objects of criticism are the progressive income tax bill and the elimination of the tax hump; the speaker allegedly does not support either measure and is seeking clarification, showing sharp oppositional pushback and preferring a scenario where the impact on people would be easily understood.

The critical stance against accelerated nuclear energy is commendable: it is emphasized that cheaper alternatives with less administrative burden (green energy) are available, and that caution should be exercised regarding both the economic aspects and the timing. It does not indicate a fundamental shift in position, but rather points to skepticism regarding a rapid nuclear solution and highlights the necessity of considering alternatives.