Session Profile: Lauri Laats

The speakers emphasize that national cybersecurity and data privacy are central concerns, and recognizing the risks associated with using Chinese technology is paramount. The current position is critical and preventative, focusing on constructive debate and the search for clear measures, including the possibility of restricting or modifying the use of Chinese technology if the threats are not subjected to broader control. This is an ongoing effort, centered on policy and security, striving for transparency and comprehensive discussion; while there is no definitive collapse, the need to clarify decisions is strongly emphasized.

The speaker's demonstrations showcase knowledge of cybersecurity and critical infrastructure safety issues (such as inverters, remote control, solar panel systems, and 800–938 MW consumption). Reference is made to the Cyber Security Yearbook published by the State Information System Authority (RIA) and the operational practices of techno-ecosystems (solar arrays, rolling stock). Emphasis is placed on understanding technical details and safety assurances, as well as assessing risks associated with technology originating from China.

The tone is polite, inquiring, and data-driven; it uses questions and hypothetical scenarios to provoke discussion and scrutiny, rather than to demonstrate aggression. The text is formal, analytical, and systematic, and seeks to balance emotional narrative with facts, while offering constructive criticism.

The address was delivered on the same day (2025-04-07) across multiple speeches before the Riigikogu plenary session; the subject was debated at length and thoroughly, drawing upon the context of the inquiry and the answers provided by the minister. This serves as a regular reference point to the specific issue, illustrating the sequential nature of the day's debate.

When the current approach of the national government is criticized, the need for clear measures and cooperation to enhance security is emphasized. There is no consensus regarding an absolute, general ban on the use of Chinese technology, but it has been noted that the state has failed to implement sufficient measures. The intense criticism is policy-based and stems from security and consumer protection concerns.

A constructive debate is being launched, along with the establishment of the need for a joint discussion in the Riigikogu. This demonstrates a readiness for cooperation and an exchange of views with various colleagues, and at a higher level, with ministers. The aim is to resolve issues through open cooperation, rather than through indifference.

The focus is both national and international (covering transit and neighboring countries). Examples from Finland, Sweden, and Norway are considered in the discussion, and the necessity of coordinating with cross-border practices is emphasized. However, the core priority remains the cyber security and consumer protection of the Estonian state.

Economically, emphasis is placed on protecting taxpayer resources and ensuring cost efficiency. Criticism is directed at the high costs associated with using Chinese technology, as well as decision-making processes that allow for the procurement of equipment that is either more expensive or less secure. A commercial and viable approach is preferred, provided that security is maintained.

The priority is citizens' privacy and cybersecurity; there is a critical and cautious stance regarding the protection of state and resident data in the context of using Chinese technology. The need for a reliable framework has been highlighted so that ordinary citizens do not have to feel they are in a dangerous environment.

The legislative focus centers on oversight concerning technology monopolies (or "tech voracity") and consumer protection. This includes organizing debates in the Riigikogu, submitting interpellations, and conducting in-depth analysis of ministerial replies. Priority is given to developing concrete measures and achieving political consensus for resolving these issues, especially when they are addressed separately as matters of national importance in the Riigikogu.