Session Profile: Lauri Laats

The main issues are the financing of national security and the advocacy of tax policy. Criticism is voiced regarding the coalition's tax policy, along with a preference for utilizing alternative solutions (such as a bank tax) instead of increasing the consumption tax. Also present is a strong, though not extreme, theme concerning remembrance and human rights—specifically, in the context of the 1944 deportation of the Crimean Tatars, emphasis has been placed on recognizing the historical tragedy and standing up for these communities. Secondly, emphasis is placed on reasonably limiting the burdens placed on the populace and maintaining fundamental responsibility in matters of taxation.

It uses data from history and economics: mentioning approximately 200,000 Crimean Tatars during the deportation and a 47% mortality rate, as well as the share of consumption tax in GDP (9.2%) and in total tax revenue (about 41%). It presents the 2025–2026 budget figures (6.5 billion, or 2.5 billion related to taxes) and discusses exactly where the money will be directed.

The speeches are primarily aimed at disputes and carry a combative tone, with the opposition being both harshly critical and somewhat inviting compromise. The emphasis is heavily data- and number-driven: figures concerning the share of VAT, GDP, and budget revenue forecasts are cited, and alongside this, historical context and emotional stories are occasionally used to reinforce positions. The speeches adhere to the formal parliamentary address format, often referencing draft legislation and the budget, and utilizing questions and direct requests to steer the debate. The emphasis is both pragmatic and moral: some speeches highlight the economic impact and criticize those who oppose taxes, while others bring up the lives of ordinary people (support for pensioners, funding for care homes) and call on legislators to act appropriately.

The speech is scheduled for October 16, 2024, and demonstrates a high level of activity in the plenary session, with several speeches addressing the same topics (budget, taxes, transparency). The speaker highlights both critical perspectives and alternative solutions, addressing various colleagues and ministers; fostering a systematic discussion surrounding budget and taxation issues.

Criticism is leveled at the government and the ruling coalition regarding tax policy. The argument is being pushed that the consumption tax will increase the cost of living and damage the economy, and an alternative (a bank tax) is proposed. Insulting remarks are directed at the government's caliber and their alleged lies, all while stressing the urgent need for honest and responsible policy.

Seeks cooperation and broader consensus: calls on all members of the Riigikogu to support the statement; presents the idea of a bank tax as an accessible compromise for coalition partners, and emphasizes the need to jointly develop better and more transparent solutions.

The focus is on national and international issues, as well as regional concerns. It mentions the experience of the Crimean Peninsula and the situation of the Crimean Tatars (a national/political context), alongside the situation in Narva care homes (a local social concern). This links them to topics affecting both the country's reputation and local necessities.

In economic policy, there is criticism regarding the increase of the consumption tax and a preference for a bank tax as a financing mechanism for the defense and security sectors. Emphasis is placed on the tax burden's effect on consumption and lower-income residents, alongside the need to manage the budget more transparently and in a more balanced way. It is argued that the rise in VAT and changes to income tax will increase the state budget, but the actual impact on the economy and people's livelihoods is viewed critically.

A position on support for pensioners and care homes: It is criticized that the necessary subsidies are not reaching enough people, and that funds are being allocated inefficiently for care homes. Emphasis is placed on the need to provide care for the elderly and specialized care services, raising concerns about whether the existing support is adequate. Furthermore, issues of remembrance and human rights have also been highlighted in the current context.

The focus is on the 2025–2026 budget sector, the discussion surrounding Draft Bill 511, and the analysis of the explanatory memorandum, along with the content and impact of the Security Tax Act. It shows interest in budget transparency and earmarking, offering alternatives (such as a bank tax) and raising objections to the current taxation scheme. Furthermore, it emphasizes the necessity of alignment with Riigikogu debates, as well as international and social considerations.