Session Profile: Lauri Laats

An opposition representative whose central focus is criticizing tax policy and reducing the cost of living and poverty. He is strongly opposed to the current tax hikes and the accelerated expansion of consumption taxes, arguing that they increase inequality and disproportionately affect low- and middle-income individuals. He notes that previous income tax cuts combined with general tax reductions deepened poverty, and views a bank tax and other measures as potentially fairer contributions that should be considered. Finally, he emphasizes the need for an honest debate and cooperation to find solutions, rather than allowing political opposition to become entrenched.

He/She demonstrates knowledge of tax and consumption policy, utilizing specific figures and examples (the VAT hike from 20% to 22%; the projected impact was 1.6%, but the actual increase in the cost of living was 5%). He/She refers to two key areas: the structure of taxation and its effect on consumer prices and poverty. The text highlights the historical experience of the impact of income tax reduction between 2003 and 2005, using these examples to argue that social policy must be intrinsically linked to taxation. He/She shows consistent attention to tax reforms and their effectiveness.

Critical, yet fact-based and inquisitive; it employs a parliamentary style, combining questions with arguments. It highlights specific figures and historical examples, attempting to demonstrate that government policy fails to meet the needs of the people. While it uses a strong emotional motivator to reference the cost of living and poverty, it maintains a relatively formal and argument-focused tone.

He/She actively participates in the plenary session that same day and delivers several speeches; utilizes inquiries and a critical line of questioning. Conducts consecutive moments of dialogue and debate, referencing both today's discussion and the decisions made by previous governments. Repeatedly emphasizes the need for answers and concrete proposals, demonstrating consistent activity on the topic of sound tax policy.

Critical of the government’s tax policy, the speaker highlights the rising cost of living and increasing poverty, directly accusing the current coalition of imposing new taxes. They express criticism regarding both consumption taxes and future tax arrangements, while also challenging false predictions and the consequences of earlier decisions. Furthermore, they put forward proposals and examples illustrating the need for change, but make it clear that an easy compromise with the government is unlikely.

It calls upon the coalition to listen to and consider proposals (e.g., concerning a bank tax, and specifically, avoiding the further increase of the general tax burden). It does not rule out cooperation, but emphasizes that solutions must be transparent, open to discussion, and inclusive of diverse opinions. It refers to historical experiences and challenges as the foundational basis for establishing cooperation.

No data available

The position on economic policy is critical and controversial: it condemns the expansion of consumption taxes, emphasizing that they raise price levels and disproportionately affect low- and middle-wage earners. It advocates for a bank tax as a fair contribution and stresses the need to avoid general tax burdens that deepen poverty. Regarding historical changes to the tax arrangement, it underlines the importance of balancing social expenditure and the overall tax structure.

The main focus is on reducing the cost of living and poverty, and ensuring social justice. He criticizes consumption taxes, which disproportionately affect the poor, and stresses the need to protect low incomes. He speaks about the necessity of financing children, families, and education, and discusses the conflicting impacts of social policy and tax policy.

The primary focus is directed toward the foundations of tax policy and the corresponding legislation: specifically, monitoring and discussing the impact of the bank tax and consumption taxes, alongside the necessity of receiving concrete answers to inquiries. It is argued that previous tax decisions (2003–2005) and their resulting impact should be taken into account when planning legislative measures. The text presents proposals and emphasizes the need for the government to be receptive and cooperative at the national level.