Agenda Profile: Lauri Laats
First Reading of the Bill to Amend the Income Tax Act (103 SE)
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
Political Position
Support for the income tax reduction bill; describing the draft legislation as highly necessary in the Riigikogu (Parliament). The representative provides a specific numerical calculation: starting in 2025, the current rate is 22%, and the bill proposes a 0.8% decrease (resulting in 19.2%). They stress the importance of seeing the impact on the individual taxpayer. This position is policy-driven, focusing on the necessity of the bill alongside a thorough impact assessment.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates knowledge of income tax rates: the current 20%, the future 22% (with a prerequisite), and the proposed 19.2% rate are mentioned. Specific figures are used, and their impact is discussed, focusing on the technical substance of the draft bill and its potential effects on individuals.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
Rhetoric is courteous and inquisitive, not aggressive; it employs questioning and an analytical approach to clarify the impact and necessity of the draft proposal.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
It refers to the presiding officer and the rapporteur, and addresses the context of the draft bill's first reading; it demonstrates parliamentary participation and the submission of a question as a required duty.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Insufficient data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
There is not enough data.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic perspective is geared toward income tax reduction; it focuses on the bill's impact on individuals and changes in the tax burden, but it does not accurately present financial forecasts or the details of compromises.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
It focuses on the first reading of the draft bill and its potential impact; it highlights the parliamentary scrutiny and the necessity of clarifying the effect on citizens.
1 Speeches Analyzed