Agenda Profile: Lauri Laats
Draft law amending the Act on Conformity Assessment of Products (533 SE) – First Reading
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
Political Position
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The presenter demonstrates knowledge of topics concerning product compliance law and the field of consumer protection, specifically referencing honey and adulteration. He/She points out that lab tests reveal DNA that does not match the characteristics of honey DNA, and stresses the importance of verifying labeling. He/She notes that even a recognized certification mark does not guarantee product quality and questions whether the law regulates such situations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The speaker's tone is calm and inquisitive, focusing on facts and examples. Examples are utilized (Pealtnägija, laboratory results), and the discussion is informative and measured. Structurally, the text is clear and formal, being less emotional than confrontational.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speeches took place on the same session day (12.12.2024) and focused on the first reading of the Product Conformity Act. The speaker refers to a previous discussion on TV safety and later continues with questions concerning the Act, demonstrating ongoing attention to the same subject matter.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
There is not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Insufficient data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
The central social theme revolves around consumer protection and food quality; the speaker highlights the danger posed by counterfeit products and the importance of controlling labeling as a matter of consumer interest. The overall tone stresses the necessity of regulating these situations by strengthening consumer protection measures.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The presentation centers on the debate regarding the first reading of Draft Bill 533 SE. The speaker raises questions about whether the legislation addresses situations involving counterfeit goods and labeling. No specific endorsements or confirmed amendments have been put forward; the focus remains on the scope of the debate and monitoring the implementation of the law.
2 Speeches Analyzed