By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Laanet

Insufficient data. The address is related to a specific extraordinary event (the question of parliamentary immunity) and refers to a long and active career as a minister and member of the Riigikogu.

The operational patterns are closely tied to the session schedule of the Riigikogu and the work plan of the Constitutional Committee, specifying exact dates for the various stages of the bill's proceedings (e.g., April 9, May 12, June 4). The rhythm is consistent, focusing on submitting procedural decisions and proposals to the plenary assembly. The role of the presiding officer is to manage the process and determine the timeline.

The patterns of activity demonstrate active work within the Constitutional Committee, including specific sittings (February 18, April 7) and a swift response to practical deadlines (May 1). Kalle Laanet has recently been appointed as the committee's new representative, replacing Hendrik Johannes Terras. Procedural decisions were made by consensus and through an expedited process.

The pattern of activity is centered on the committee's work and the making of procedural decisions, documenting the Constitutional Committee's session held on January 27, 2025. The delay in the draft bill's further proceedings in the plenary session is also noted. Mention is made of the heavy workload of ministry representatives, which results from parallel discussions occurring in several committees.

Not enough data.

The pattern of activity is related to the work of the Constitutional Committee, where participants engage in discussions and subsequently present a detailed overview of the procedural progress and decisions to the plenary session. The speaker referenced a specific committee meeting (October 14) and the bill's earlier procedure.

The pattern of activity is linked to the role of rapporteur for the Constitutional Committee at the plenary session, where a detailed overview of the committee's debate and procedural decisions, which took place on October 21, 2024, is presented. The speaker also refers to previous participation in the work of at least two investigative committees, one of which he or she chaired.

The course of action involves participating in the plenary session of the Riigikogu, posing questions to the President of the Bank of Estonia regarding the financing of national defense. This demonstrates active participation in legislative oversight and debate.

The speaker is actively involved in the work of the Riigikogu Constitutional Committee, attending sittings where the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Prosecutor General were heard. There is also mention of personal efforts this year to become more closely acquainted with the judicial system. This record demonstrates active participation in legislative oversight processes.

The pattern of activity is related to the work of the Riigikogu Constitutional Committee, involving participation in sessions and the subsequent presentation of consensual decisions and the substance of the discussion to the plenary assembly. [He/She] fulfills the role of the committee's rapporteur, providing an overview of the April 30 session.