By Months: Kalle Laanet
Total Months: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
05.2025
4 Speeches
The style is formal and structured in the legislative submission, but becomes personal, defensive, and critical when addressing criminal proceedings. It employs strong logical arguments, relying on the text of the law and procedural rules, to substantiate its lawful conduct. The criticism directed at the legal system is sharp, using phrases like "blatantly unjust" and referring to people being "processed to death."
04.2025
1 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal and procedural, focusing on explanation and legal requirements, as this is a summary of a committee meeting. The argumentation is based on logical necessity (e.g., fulfilling PPA obligations, cost savings) and the mitigation of security risks. During the discussion, Eduard Odinets raised an ethical and legal question concerning the harshness of leaving children stateless.
03.2025
1 Speeches
The address is formal and procedural, neutrally conveying the substance and decisions of the Constitutional Committee's debate. The argumentation is predominantly logical, focusing on the efficiency of parliamentary work (avoiding fragmentation) and comparing the toolkits of investigative bodies. Lauri Laats adds a critical tone, referring to the prime minister's "incomplete answers or outright evasion" regarding the funding of Nordica.
02.2025
1 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and serious, emphasizing the need for rapid steps due to the complete transformation of the security situation. The speaker employs historical references (the divider/uniter of the Baltic Sea, General Kert) and presents logical arguments regarding the necessity of increasing capabilities. The overall tone, expressing support for the Reform Party, is optimistic and vigorous.
11.2024
11 Speeches
The speaker's style is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the precise conveyance of the commission's discussions and decisions, often distinguishing their personal viewpoint from the commission's. The tone is pragmatic and cautious, warning against treating the investigative committee as a "silver bullet." Emphasis is placed on logical arguments, legal constraints, and procedural correctness, avoiding emotional appeals.
06.2024
3 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and constructive, yet it also contains a moderate degree of urgency, particularly concerning the necessity of judicial system reform ("this moment must not be allowed to pass"). The speaker relies heavily on logical arguments, citing both the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and recognized authorities (Anatoly Zimichev), and utilizing data to substantiate their viewpoints.
05.2024
2 Speeches
The style of discourse is predominantly formal, informative, and procedural, especially when presenting the commission's report (listing participants and decisions). When expressing a personal viewpoint, the tone becomes moderately assertive, emphasizing that the justification is "courteous and proper," utilizing logical appeals.